Not intolerance for disagreement… intolerance for stupidity. There is a difference
Well, whats good enough for Republican appointed judges is good enough for Democrat appointed judges. Like all the other shananigans the democrats have ever pulled, this too will come back to bite them in the ass.
I really don’t think you do.
What are you even talking about, at this point?
Ok. Maybe he can’t be prevented from being on the court because we called him a sex criminal, since we can’t prove it. But he shouldn’t be allowed on the court because he got real upset when we called him a sex criminal.
He didn’t just get upset. He went full blown looney tunes.
The question for me was whether an unsubstantiated 40 year old allegation should be the reason for anyone in virtually any profession not to be promoted or even to lose their job over? If such a standard were to exist that would mean any man going for a promotion should be denied that promotion if any woman arbitrarily decided to make an unfalsifiable allegation of sexual misconduct.
If they weren’t stupid, they would agree with you?
And when you’re talking opportunity for advancement or employment, who wouldn’t take that as a way to get a leg up on their competition?
Like with a cloth?
Here’s your albatross
The Democrats should have conducted themselves as if it was “akin” to a
job interview, but they didn’t! They conducted themselves as unethical liberal political hacks.
