Oh my goodness. Its not just liberals who, when they say what I say, don’t.
We aren’t talking about slandering a party. We are talking about making stuff up about individual nominees with the sole intention of derailing their nomination.
There’s never been any compunction in slandering people in a right.
Where it be slandering a nominee. Slandering a candidate. Slandering a official. Slandering a judge. Shoot, the right will slander a private citizen if they get in the way.
Also, when it comes to “innocense” what’s missing is the 2 nd c.
actually it was justice in poor neighborhoods where people are assumed guilty.
try to think just a little
for exaMPLE
“Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up!”
cover up, cover up, cover up
Said by people who believe that Hillary has committed numerable crimes that are still actionable in a court of law … vs yet another “the seriousness of the charges” accusation which even taken at face value cannot be.
Which are not job interviews, stop deflecting.
Has Clinton been charged with any crimes, let alone convicted?
What happened to due process?
She has been protected.
Of course. Due process doesn’t matter when you have feelings.
Please expand if you could.
talking about the OP, pretty clear outline of thoughts
please give some examples to support you point of view.
it was lost in immunity
you have to summarize a link if you post one, forum rules
Barack Obama is married to Michelle and Bill is married to Hillary.
slanderous,
what I meant to say is it is not slander if it is true
