For Obama, nobody was trying to injure or kill agents. No main stream media fake outrage or even coverage. No sanctuary cities or states. Just a few obscure far left outlets even cared. Other than that, they’re EXACTLY the same. Fake outrage by fake people claiming to care about the wellbeing of child predators, human traffickers and street goons. In other words, it’s driven by TDS and other mental illnesses. Enjoy the video!
3 Likes
The difference is self explanatory. Especially since you cited to an articles expressing outrage over the Obama raid
1 Like
Posts article about resistance and outrage. Titled resistance and outrage
Question - WHERE WAS THE RESISTANCE AND OUTRAGE for Obama raids?!?!?!
3 Likes
This is a whole new level of dumb.
4 Likes
It’s a matter of degree. Most proponents of mass migration are Democrats. Other than his deportations, they would be supporters of Obama and hesitate to stir up outrage against him. There is no such hesitation in stirring up hatred against Trump.
3 Likes
It is a matter of degree. There are plenty of subjects that stirred up outrage against Obama among the left. It’s just not published in your outrage sources 
The article included in the OP is about outrage stirred up towards Obama’s actions.
You were not living in th US during the Obama Presidency if you think the protests and outrage against Obama were at the same level as Trump ICE enforcement.
Did I say there was no opposition to Obama’s deportations or did I say the difference was a matter of degree?
3 Likes
I wasn’t, actually. But scale and technique both matter.
The OP is upset there’s no outrage and proves his pint by posting an article about said outrage.
No doubt those are different now too. Obama wasn’t taking over from a period where the former President had virtually ended interior immigration law enforcement and had even blocked border states from defending their own borders. The problem was different.
3 Likes
The difference is the prioritization of mass deportation.
1 Like
Ok. Let’s dive a little deeper. Why no mass hysteria? Why no Gestapo? Why no interests at all from the MSM? Why no assaults on ICE. Please don’t act like things are the same as they were then. That’s an insult to my intelligence and yours. My questions are legit. Try again.
3 Likes
Again, Obama was not faced with the same problem left by Bush that Trump was left with by Biden. And yet still Obama was no slouch with deportations.
You didn’t even know about this until I showed you. Why no violence against ICE or Real media coverage. Just some lady that nobody has ever heard of.
1 Like
Wrong answer. Obama was known as the deporter in chief. It was definitely a priority. Try an honest answer. The one that you know is correct but refuse to acknowledge.
1 Like
Yes. The situations were different. You could argue the Obama administration was more tactful in how they implemented deportations. Trump, with Miller and Homan, are brutish and unrelenting in their messaging about deportations.
From an obscure media outlet, I’ve never heard of vs the 24/7/365 ad nauseum days of reporting lies by legacy media and the freaking Democrat Party whose elected officials make subversion “ads” directed at our military.
It’s nothing more than open resistance of the outcome of 2024 election and the mental condition of TDS.
4 Likes
Unrelenting in enforcing our laws, yes. Only “brutish” to the extent any law enforcement must be towards those who decide to physically resist enforcement.
1 Like
Oh Good Lord. So millions of liberals are OK with mass deportations if the optics are better? Good Lord. These answers are pathetic. Just man up and give the real reason.
1 Like
Are you saying that Obama wasn’t enforcing our laws? He was. Deportation by the government has been turned into a rallying cry by this administration when it used to be considered a normal function of our government.
1 Like