What happens when our government invites millions of foreign nationals from barbaric countries into ours?

Says the one posting absurdities.

Supporting foreign policy isn’t the same as supporting laws and the constitution

Denaturalizing protestors is epic support of the first amendment.

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

Please by all means. Show me where it says voice support for an admitted and declared enemy of the US.

In fact doing so would seem to be against the oath thereby voiding any contract.

Bye-bye

1 Like

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;

They [those who support Hamas] are, by their own words, confessed domestic enemies of the United States.

Keep in mind, you can’t reason with a domestic enemy operative. You are wasting your time if you try.

Getting back to the subject of the thread . . .

Are we, here in the United States, now witnessing what happens when our government invites millions of foreign nationals from barbaric countries into ours?

Where does it say support American foreign policy

Hihi

Denaturalization is written into law. You should have quoted that.

Also please don’t use terms you don’t understand. Naturalization isn’t a contract. Breach of an oath doesn’t necessarily breach if it appears in a contrcst. Which would be a funny contract to begin with :joy:

Excellent response!

Still waiting for you to show me where it says support our enemies.

Oh an no need for the typical leftist arrogance and condescension. I have taken oaths a numerous occasions during my life. Know exactly what thy are, and while doesn’t hold the force of a contract, to the honorable they carry the same weight. Difference between myself and a leftist. I actually have kept mine.

You want to suspend the Constitution?

So at least you admit that it doesn’t hold the force of a contract. That’s step 1

Your attempt to edit the oath to include things that it clearly doesn’t and then arguing that the absence of those items makes them prohibitive ignores the first amendment.

Mmmmmm

Not editing anything. In fact I posted the oath.

Still looking and doesn’t say anything about supporting the countries enemies.

Someone does.

Not at all.

But someone does.

The absence of an act doesn’t prohibit the act.

1 Like

Lock them up!

If it is not expressly illegal, it is legal.

1 Like

Send them back to the ■■■■■■■■ countries they came from.

1 Like