Do you honestly think Trump thought he’d get Mexico to pay for the wall?..lol. Or have H. Clinton locked up?
Then demonstrate it.
Directly no, indirectly yes and they are, have been, and will continue to do so.
When we shut down the border suddenly all those illegals became their economic problem instead of ours and we came out way ahead on the new trade deal.
Now not only is Mexico having to deal with all of the economic damage they are having to enforce their own southern border saving us hundreds of millions of dollars in reduced traffic across our border.
1 Like
If you say so…
Try disputing any of the facts as stated if you think you can.
https://twnews.us/us-news/supreme-court-allows-border-wall-construction-to-continue
…and here we go again. Build that wall…build that wall…build that wall… 
1 Like
What facts?
The wall will never be built. Illegals will find other ways to come into the country.
Plus the flimsy wall Trump touted keeps blowing over in the wind.
Unfortunately, by a 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court recently stated that the Trump Administration can continue to build their destructive wall along the border. A little over a month ago, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the Trump Administration’s funding of the wall was illegal and unconstitutional. And the Supreme Court ruled in Clinton v. New York City back in 1998 that only Congress has the power of the purse.
Notice the pattern of the 9th Circuit continuously being overruled by the SCOTUS? How many times should this happen before they are removed for taking political sides, instead of being a neutral judicial body?
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is not the left-leaning Court as it used to be. And there are two Supreme Court decisions that point to what the Trump Administration is doing in regards to the funding of the wall is unconstitutional. They are Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer from 1952 and Clinton v. New York City from 1998.
Is the Supreme Court of the USA a neutral judicial body?
