Gotta hand it to those liberty living, Constitution supporting Libs. They don’t believe in censorship, yet they won’t allow Donald Trump to give a speech on their networks.
In both Iowa and New Hampshire, Donald Trump was cut off or spoken over during his victory speech. This, of course, to prevent “misinformation” from being heard by their 127 viewers. And who is the arbiter of what constitutes misinformation you ask? None other than Rachel Madcow.
You Libs should text her and her network and let them know know how much safer and more informed you feel due to her vigilance, not to mention her towering intellect which she deigned to use for your benefit by deciding that you guys can’t handle or discern for yourselves what is and is not misinformation.
Gee whiz you Libs are so fortunate to have such dear benevolent people looking out for you by preventing you from straining your brains!
THANKS RACHEL AND ALL YOU LIBS LEADERS AND MEDIA PEOPLE FOR CARING SO MUCH FOR OUR CHALLENGED PEOPLE OF AMERICA!
Well first, it’s not censorship. Media outlets are not required to cover or even broadcast political speeches. Just like if NewsMax decides not to broadcast a Biden speech, it’s still not censorship. These are all, ultimately, business decisions. Back in 2016, Media outlets couldn’t get enough Trump coverage. There was a fascination with Trump the bombastic “orator” and people wondered what he would say next. The media couldn’t get enough. That’s not the case anymore. Most people, outside of the MAGA faithful, aren’t that interested in what he hast to say. And typically it’s all things he’s said before.
/TLDR. Not censorship. Money talks. We’ve heard it all before.
Nice try but no cigar since I saw an entire speech on… Newsmax! And I’m sure Fox News and other conservative media broadcast any speech Biden manages to spit out.
Well of course not. After all Rachel was very firm in her explanation of how She and her network of “fact checkers” had a DUTY to not allow Donald Trump and his exaggerations, misinformation and outright lies to be heard. That’s why instead of just not showing his speech, she and/or her " fact checkers" were SPEAKING OVER DONALD TRUMP so you guys wouldn’t be exposed to his misinformation and the network couldn’t be held liable for spreading such malicious, ignorant and downright dangerous misinformation. Good Lord man, did you not hear him mistake Nikki Haley for NANCY PELOSI??? It’s a good thing too, it’s hard to imagine ERs throughout the country suddenly being inundated with Libs who hurt themselves trying to discern truth from misinformation for themselves.
I mean inundated more because of having to wait until all the illegals are treated first…
I’d say we all owe Rachel a big debt of gratitude!
When Newsmax allows Joe to start a speech, then begins speaking over him when he starts saying things they don’t like and a host explaining that they can’t allow what Joe is saying right now be heard because they have a duty to protect its viewers from misinformation, then yes, Ill be glad to accuse Newsmax of censorship.
The only people cutting Joe Biden off are his handlers, and then only because he starts saying something stupid which allows the public to see his senility.
Give me an example of Newsmax cutting Joe off for spreading misinformation because they have a duty to protect their viewers.
Newsmax cut away from a Biden speech. How is that different?
BTW Newsmax is entitled to show as much or as little of a speech as they want. They are free to talk over and ignore any speech. just like any media outlet.
It’s not censorship or a restriction on free speech.
