US Trade deficit Narrows SHARPLY in April . . . . Down a whopping 46% (I guess the "rising inventories" story is over.)

This does not seem to be getting much coverage in the media.

  • “Rising inventories” and "getting ahead of the Trump tariff, got plenty of coverage, it was a 5.7% increase in imports.
  • Now imports are down 19.8% and if you blink, you’ll completely miss all the media coverage.

Anyway, some guy on CNBC mentioned it so I did a google search.
Here’s the best of what I found:


Fri, May 30, 2025 at 8:50 a.m. EDT 1 min read

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. trade deficit in goods narrowed sharply in April as the boost from the front-running of imports ahead of tariffs faded.

The goods trade gap contracted 46.0% to $87.6 billion last month, the Commerce Department’s Census Bureau said on Friday. Goods imports decreased $68.4 billion to $276.1 billion. Exports of goods increased $6.3 billion to $188.5 billion.

.
.
.
.

The US trade deficit in goods narrowed significantly to $87.6 billion in April 2025, down $74.6 billion, or 46%, from a record $162.3 billion in March, according to an advance estimate.

The sharp contraction was driven by a 19.8% drop in imports, following a 5.7% increase the previous month, as the Trump administration’s new tariffs took effect.

Import declines were broad-based, with the steepest drops seen in consumer goods (-32.3%), industrial supplies (-31.1%), and automotive vehicles (-19.1%).

At the same time, exports continued to rise, increasing 3.4% in April after a 2.3% gain in March.

Growth was led by industrial supplies (+15.5%) and other goods (+10.1%).

However, exports of automotive vehicles fell sharply (-21.6%), along with consumer goods (-7.4%).

2 Likes

Highlights from above

— 19.8% drop in imports,
— 3.4% increase in exports

IMPORTS:
Consumer goods (-32.3%)
Industrial supplies (-31.1%)
Automotive vehicles (-19.1%).

EXPORTS:
Industrial supplies (+15.5%)
Automotive vehicles fell sharply (-21.6%)
Consumer goods (-7.4%)
Other goods (+10.1%).

Pretty big changes for so little coverage.

1 Like

Most headlines are proclaiming this-possible-disaster or that-possible-disaster from the administrations actions.

Yes there were plenty of social media posts gasping about the lack of ships coming to US harbors . . . and today’s media is often little more than a “journalist” summarizing tweets from one side of the poltical spectrum.

Probably half the news stories out there could be rewritten as
“Here is a summary of social media postings that make my political ideas look good.”

Anyway yes. to the extent that this ground-breaking story was covered, it was covered earlier as “Impending disaster! Remember the baby formula shortage? Gasp Trump is gonna kill us all!!”

You want them to report that we have fewer goods to choose from?

Because that’s what the top level takeaway from the numbers is.

You noticed it too? Man, there were only 90 different choices of breakfast cereals at the supermarket yesterday instead of 93.

Or something… :roll_eyes:

2 Likes

Now we get our choice of jobs,
instead of our choice of chia pets.
(I hear they are eliminating the Sponge Bob chia pet)

I’ll take that deal any day of the week

1 Like