US announces that the G7 summit in 2020 will be held at a resort that trump owns in south Florida

They are wrong.

It would just be better to hold it somewhere else and then there would be no conflict of interest.

The same people who embrace Socialism?
That’s a good joke.

Trump wanted to host the summit in the Lincoln bedroom but he couldn’t because the Clintons have it booked till 2025.

ITs even worse then that. “At cost” means they arent losing money. Take a look - This resort in June is always the lowest revenue. Even in years where the resort was profitable, June operated at a loss.
If I buy season tickets for baseball every year and sell my weekend tickets for profit and then my week day tickets for a loss - but then one year -I arrange all the weekday tickets to be sold “at cost” - it increased my profit for the year since I normally take a loss for some games.

Most resorts in FL (and this one is no different) take a loss in June. Because he directed the G7 to be held there -They will have less of a loss and increase their yearly profits.

Ouch!

#GOP Group Uses Trump’s Own Words On Corruption Against Him In Searing Fox News Ad

The 67-second ad will air on Fox News in the Washington, D.C., area on Monday during the widely watched morning show “Fox & Friends.” It will also appear on the conservative network’s digital platforms

.

“While candidate Trump was running for president he promised to drain the swamp and tackle corruption,” said Sarah Longwell, the executive director of Republicans for the Rule of Law.

“Instead he is using the U.S. government and taxpayer money to enrich himself and his family,” Longwell added. “Holding the G-7 at a Trump property is inappropriate and Republicans should condemn the president’s continued efforts to use the office of the presidency for his personal enrichment.”

1 Like

The emoluments clause makes no exception for “at cost”…

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

He needs the consent of congress…

That kind of pedestrian slavishness to law serves only those who benefit from bureaucracy.

Pedestrian slavishness to law can also get you removed from office…

1 Like

Guys, dont be haters…

You see, this is actually great for the public treasury

The act of being elected was enough for the Washington Post to call for his impea hment a half hour after being inaugurated.

Fat donald should’ve immediately been impeached after the Helsinki fiasco.

1 Like

What? That was a HUGE success? Libs were totally triggered by that.

That would have been a great move for the USA.
Only our enemies thought otherwise.

It’s being done at cost which means NO PROFIT which also means it’s going to be less expensive then if it was held anywhere else.

2 Likes

Sure it is. According to Trump, of course. And they’re not releasing how the WH made that decision because…reasons.

It doesn’t have to be at profit for there to be a huge conflict. It’s immediately raised the profile of Trumps property for one. Big feather in the cap for that business.

You don’t have to defend everything he does.

What is the cost to hold it at Camp David? Whether there is a profit or not is irrelevant.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

He needs the consent of congress…

As has already been pointed out - Trump’s resort (like every other resort in Florida) normally losses money in the summer. By seeking these rooms “at cost”, the hotel is still making more money than they would have otherwise.

As for your second claim - that it will be “less expensive” - please provide some evidence to support.

Which part of the Emoluments Clause don’t you get?

“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State”

ARTICLE I, SECTION 9, CLAUSE 8

Government business should be conducted on government property.