Uh oh! Competition for the 'Rona Narrative!

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

P.S. There is a way to figure this out but you need more than three people.

Why? Three’s enough.

You should stick to lawyering. A sample size of three for this conclusion is ridiculously small.

Small, but sufficient.

Sufficient for what? It isn’t sufficient to have a 75% confidence in your conclusion. Three anecdotes isn’t even high enough to have 50% confidence. It’s laughably low.

But what conclusions do you think you can draw from those three anecdotes? I’m really curious.

[WuWei]

For an experiment.

[FloridaYankee]

@Piper

@Borgia_dude

Don’t most people recover from Covid without Ivermectin? How can you know if Ivermectin caused your three associate’s recoveries or if they just recovered naturally like most everyone else?No

P.S. There is a way to figure this out but you need more than three people.

No. Jezcoe said: “Ivermectin is worthless when it comes to treating Covid.” Where is the proof for that statement?

He showed the proof.

[FloridaYankee]

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

P.S. There is a way to figure this out but you need more than three people.

Why? Three’s enough.

You should stick to lawyering. A sample size of three for this conclusion is ridiculously small.

Small, but sufficient.

Sufficient for what? It isn’t sufficient to have a 75% confidence in your conclusion. Three anecdotes isn’t even high enough to have 50% confidence. It’s laughably low.

But what conclusions do you think you can draw from those three anecdotes? I’m really curious.

I know three people that recovered without it, that’s gonna throw the numbers all out of whack! Yikes!

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

For an experiment.

Not for this experiment. If the probabilities were different, a sample size of three might be meaningful, but not for Ivermectin and Covid. It’s hard to demonstrate effectiveness of “something” if it is hardly different in outcomes than the “no something” case.

[zantax]

@FloridaYankee

@Piper

@Borgia_dude

Don’t most people recover from Covid without Ivermectin? How can you know if Ivermectin caused your three associate’s recoveries or if they just recovered naturally like most everyone else?No

P.S. There is a way to figure this out but you need more than three people.

No. Jezcoe said: “Ivermectin is worthless when it comes to treating Covid.” Where is the proof for that statement?

He showed the proof.

There have been like thirty studies on it, with differing results. He is picking the cherries he wants.

[DougBH]

@Piper

I know three people personally that took Ivemectin and recovered from Covid. One lady took Ivemectin two days and was well the third day.

My son had Covid and took nothing. He was over it by the fourth day. Anecdotes don’t work. Large controlled tests work.

[WuWei]

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

For an experiment.

Not for this experiment. If the probabilities were different, a sample size of three might be meaningful, but not for Ivermectin and Covid. It’s hard to demonstrate effectiveness of “something” if it is hardly different in outcomes than the “no something” case.

I disagree.

[WuWei]

@DougBH

Anecdotes don’t work. Large controlled tests work.

I also disagree with that.

[DougBH]

So we are still where it may or may not work. As opposed to an anti viral that has strong evidence of working. I know which I would choose assuming doctor’s recommendation.

[conan]

@fallenturtle

But regardless, you believe in a conspiracy theory that Biden is a puppet.

And you actually believe this conspiracy Biden is in control.

[Piper]

@DougBH

My son had Covid and took nothing. He was over it by the fourth day. Anecdotes don’t work. Large controlled tests work.

I gave what I had I didn’t have a large controlled test to offer.

I took the regeneron injection when I had the China Virus.

[WuWei]

I kinda hope he isn’t. I am loathe to think somebody with a half a century as a senator was that stupid all along.

[JayJay]

There have not been thirty studies showing ivermectin alone being used.

There’s only been a couple…one of which was fraudulent, the others which were wracked with errors.

[FloridaYankee]

@zantax

@FloridaYankee

@Piper

@Borgia_dude

Don’t most people recover from Covid without Ivermectin? How can you know if Ivermectin caused your three associate’s recoveries or if they just recovered naturally like most everyone else?No

P.S. There is a way to figure this out but you need more than three people.

No. Jezcoe said: “Ivermectin is worthless when it comes to treating Covid.” Where is the proof for that statement?

He showed the proof.

There have been like thirty studies on it, with differing results. He is picking the cherries he wants.

Show a better one, what you are saying is not true.

[tnt]

@zantax

There have been like thirty studies on it, with differing results. He is picking the cherries he wants.

the only studies that showed positive effects were fraudulent.

[JayJay]

Even the COVID Hunter doctor in Houston admits that although it is part of the early therapy cocktail he gives his patients with COVID, it’s so early in the game…and the cocktail contains so many other things…that it’s hard to say definitively which part of the cocktail is providing the beneficial effect.

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

@Borgia_dude

@WuWei

For an experiment.

Not for this experiment. If the probabilities were different, a sample size of three might be meaningful, but not for Ivermectin and Covid. It’s hard to demonstrate effectiveness of “something” if it is hardly different in outcomes than the “no something” case.

I disagree.

You can disagree til the cows come home it won’t change facts about sample size requirements and confidence.

Three may give you confidence, that’s your choice, but it isn’t supported by statistics.

[WuWei]

That’s your opinion, not a fact.

[Borgia_dude]

@WuWei

That’s your opinion, not a fact.

If you want a confidence of about 10%, your opinion is correct.