It’s his modus operandi. Post something incredibly long that no one reads littered with quotes that typically have tangential relevance. If refuted, post even longer replies with more quotes. Eventually, he’ll just ignore any evidence to the contrary and post a non-sequitur.
He’s not on here for a two way discussion. Just a sounding board for his ideas presented in a pseudo-intellectual manner.
I feel the same way. I saved enough in ten years (I also own property in anotger country) to keep me afloat for two years. So, let these numbnuts burn it all down.
So as long as it hurts Mexico slightly more, you’re fine with losing your fellow Americans over 700 million per day (not counting loss of things like imported raw materials for manufacturing and a significant portion of your food supply). I am absolutely anti-illegal immigration. However, I’m sure there’s a solution that wouldn’t take down 1000s of Americans with it. I suppose if it doesn’t hurt you directly that’s fine though? They should just take it for the team?
I understand exactly what your objective is in this forum.
JWK
It was March of 2019 when an ongoing invasion of America’s borders swelled to tens of thousands a month, not a shot was fired to defend the borders of the United States, and America’s domestic enemies ___ socialists, communists and anarchists in Congress ___ continued with their obstruction against securing America’s borders and refused to pass laws allowing an immediate repatriation of undesirable foreigners who are invading America’s borders.