Two Sides of the Same Coin

DougBH · September 23, 2019, 3:42pm

A lot of people agreed Cohen was a liar and corrupt, but whenever he said something bad about Trump they were ready to believe it.
Now…can you prove that prosecutor was corrupt?

Cratic3947 · September 23, 2019, 3:44pm

at least the left knows about Biden now… Trump tweets are the only way they would find out…

Billions v Millions… LOL!

Colfax · September 23, 2019, 3:48pm

Cohen is a liar and is corrupt which is why his unsupported statements were never used as a predicate for any investigation. See the difference?

JayJay · September 23, 2019, 11:26pm

Steel-W0LF:

CassandraJoe:

mike_c_56:

Joe withholds a billion in financial aid to Ukraine to protect Hunter…

Wataminnit……If VP Biden withheld aid (can he do that?) to protect his son from a corruption investigation, there must have been some basis for the investigation and U.S. Intelligence and U.S. diplomats surely must have had some information about it. The communications get pretty specific about that stuff, to include bank account numbers, specific laws broken, accomplices, etc.

And if U.S. officials knew the specifics then, why don’t they know now?

And if they DO know Ukrainian laws Hunter Biden broke, why are they being cagey and asking Ukraine to do the investigation for them? If the U.S. diplomatic staff has information on criminal activity of an American overseas, shouldn’t they share it - not just with the Ukrainians, but with the public as well? This isn’t National Security Secret information. And the President has the authority to declassify it.

So if the U.S. has evidence of criminal activity by Hunter Biden, why don’t they just come out with it?

Because Hunter didn’t really break any laws. It was the classic “don’t bribe me, bribe my family” thing many politicians think is ok.

They can’t give the money to Joe… that would be a bribe! So they take real good care of his kid, give him an outlandish salary for a job he doesn’t come close to qualifying for.

You think Joe REALLY cares if some justice in the Ukraine is a sleazeball? Or is it more likely that Joe cared that said sleazeball was investigating his sons sweatheart source of money?

This would be a cool story if there existed even one whit of evidence Shokin was investigating Hunter’s “sweetheart source of money”.

Too bad there isn’t. That just makes it a cheesy fiction novel.

Steel-W0LF · September 24, 2019, 2:12am

JayJay:

Steel-W0LF:

CassandraJoe:

mike_c_56:

Joe withholds a billion in financial aid to Ukraine to protect Hunter…

Wataminnit……If VP Biden withheld aid (can he do that?) to protect his son from a corruption investigation, there must have been some basis for the investigation and U.S. Intelligence and U.S. diplomats surely must have had some information about it. The communications get pretty specific about that stuff, to include bank account numbers, specific laws broken, accomplices, etc.

And if U.S. officials knew the specifics then, why don’t they know now?

And if they DO know Ukrainian laws Hunter Biden broke, why are they being cagey and asking Ukraine to do the investigation for them? If the U.S. diplomatic staff has information on criminal activity of an American overseas, shouldn’t they share it - not just with the Ukrainians, but with the public as well? This isn’t National Security Secret information. And the President has the authority to declassify it.

So if the U.S. has evidence of criminal activity by Hunter Biden, why don’t they just come out with it?

Because Hunter didn’t really break any laws. It was the classic “don’t bribe me, bribe my family” thing many politicians think is ok.

They can’t give the money to Joe… that would be a bribe! So they take real good care of his kid, give him an outlandish salary for a job he doesn’t come close to qualifying for.

You think Joe REALLY cares if some justice in the Ukraine is a sleazeball? Or is it more likely that Joe cared that said sleazeball was investigating his sons sweatheart source of money?

This would be a cool story if there existed even one whit of evidence Shokin was investigating Hunter’s “sweetheart source of money”.

Too bad there isn’t. That just makes it a cheesy fiction novel.

Yeah. I hear firing the investigator is a perfectly normal way of finding the truth.

Oh wait. You guys hollered to high heaven when You thought Trump was going to fire Muller because you thought it would be obstruction.

SeaManatee · September 24, 2019, 2:14am

Shokin is Q.

BlueTex · September 24, 2019, 2:27am

I’ll just drop this right here for now…

Steel-W0LF · September 24, 2019, 2:35am

Drop that where you want. That article reads that they did that on their own.

If you view that as bad, what Biden did was worse.

So which is it?

BlueTex · September 24, 2019, 2:39am

They dropped the cooperation with Mueller on Manafort because…

If the evidence support corruption by Biden, why has the Trump administration not pursued violations of the FCPA charges against Biden? Are they scared of Biden?

TheDoctorIsIn · September 24, 2019, 2:43am

It’s because we have a real justice system.

Trump knows that neither Biden, nor his son could be prosecuted in the US. The evidence just isn’t there.

In the Ukraine, though - there, Trump has a chance. He’s trying to use the corrupt “justice” system of a failed state to take revenge on his political enemies.

JayJay · September 24, 2019, 3:17am

Steel-W0LF:

JayJay:

Steel-W0LF:

CassandraJoe:

mike_c_56:

Joe withholds a billion in financial aid to Ukraine to protect Hunter…

Wataminnit……If VP Biden withheld aid (can he do that?) to protect his son from a corruption investigation, there must have been some basis for the investigation and U.S. Intelligence and U.S. diplomats surely must have had some information about it. The communications get pretty specific about that stuff, to include bank account numbers, specific laws broken, accomplices, etc.

And if U.S. officials knew the specifics then, why don’t they know now?

And if they DO know Ukrainian laws Hunter Biden broke, why are they being cagey and asking Ukraine to do the investigation for them? If the U.S. diplomatic staff has information on criminal activity of an American overseas, shouldn’t they share it - not just with the Ukrainians, but with the public as well? This isn’t National Security Secret information. And the President has the authority to declassify it.

So if the U.S. has evidence of criminal activity by Hunter Biden, why don’t they just come out with it?

Because Hunter didn’t really break any laws. It was the classic “don’t bribe me, bribe my family” thing many politicians think is ok.

They can’t give the money to Joe… that would be a bribe! So they take real good care of his kid, give him an outlandish salary for a job he doesn’t come close to qualifying for.

You think Joe REALLY cares if some justice in the Ukraine is a sleazeball? Or is it more likely that Joe cared that said sleazeball was investigating his sons sweatheart source of money?

This would be a cool story if there existed even one whit of evidence Shokin was investigating Hunter’s “sweetheart source of money”.

Too bad there isn’t. That just makes it a cheesy fiction novel.

Yeah. I hear firing the investigator is a perfectly normal way of finding the truth.

Oh wait. You guys hollered to high heaven when You thought Trump was going to fire Muller because you thought it would be obstruction.

Can’t “fire the investigator” when he’s not investigating anyone.

Steel-W0LF · September 24, 2019, 3:19am

Yeah. If you parse out that statement to its most literal, it’s accurate. It was the company that employed him that was being investigated.

Colfax · September 24, 2019, 3:42am

Still no. There were no active investigations into Mykola Zlochevsky or Burisma holdings.