Well it is the only way they can make money 
1 Like
Sure but are they doing it because they want to control thoughts and discourse?
By the way I abhor corporate censorship outside of the truly criminal.
Haven’t followed them very closely, they aren’t that consequential yet.
Right that’s the shrug off i was describing earlier
If the dream of Musk bringing light to Twitter nefariousness doesn’t pan out. And i am not saying it won’t by the way. One can just go meh and move on to another dream….
Remember the Great Palin Purge on the old board? Was that election tampering?
This board doesn’t have enough users to sway an election for dog catcher.
3 Likes
Ohhh…I see…so it’s not the ACTION that you object to…it’s the AFFECT.
You don’t care if social media sites ban people. You just care if they ban people you want to be heard…the other folks, the liberal voice causalities banned for calling Palin dumb…well, they don’t matter to your grievance because…well, because you want them quite during an election anyway.
2 Likes
No, I don’t want people censored anywhere but that doesn’t mean it always rises to the level of swaying an election. I didn’t ban anyone or suggest anyone be banned for calling Palin stupid.
But my point is, in theory, the actions are the same. Twitter, and Hannityland both have ToS.
If you break them, you are banned.
But one, you condemn as election tampering, the other you excuse.
One (according to you) banned conservative voices, the other liberal voices.
I don’t excuse the censorship I just realize it doesn’t have the potential to sway an election and so is of less concern.
What’s a good price to be some Tweeter?
1 Like
Don’t know, but the billionaire who just bought Twitter posted this savage meme.
Is Musk also a meme lord or did the butler do it? 
2 Likes
Maybe he is John Gault…
2 Likes
Probably true.
1 Like
Yeah, why shouldn’t he??
1 Like
MSM X. or XMSM
Will rename it X on day one.
1 Like
