Totally wrong! They dont appeal to anyones points of view. Actually Big Tech is appealing to certain points of view, banning those who have different points of view
Itâs amazing the right clings to this delusion.
whatever kind of nonesese you believe, its your problem
That isnt the issue of this thread, but the fact the Big Tech ally with a hostile power , working against USA and the west
Why am I not surprised youâre totally aware of how that cesspool operates?
Soooo funny and debunking at the same time how vigorously the liberals defend the Big Tech, which ban conservatives in the west, and banned recently plenty of Chinese accounts remembering the victims of Tienanmen in ChinaâŚ
Isnt the point of this thread.
I actually prefere that âcesspoolâ so far they dont ally with China and allow free speech for everyone.
You are free to move to China together with your stalinist Big Tech if you dont like free speech, and everyone is happy on their way
It wonât be long they will ban any news that will reflect badly for dems. Googles is already wiped out lot of history concerning their past.
Gab is an English-language social media website, launched publicly in 2017, known for its mainly far-right user base.[9] The site has been described as âextremist friendlyâ[10] or a âsafe havenâ[11] for neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and the alt-right.
No, youâve completely missed the issue. The world markets are realigning. Youâre confused with this Twitter/China thing. Big Tech sees the changing landscape and is moving accordingly. Almost everything Trump has done since heâs been in office has made it worse, in the long run, for the US.
So, continue on with your Mr. Magoo look at whatâs happening with Twitter and donât bother looking at the bigger picture.
1 Like
As I said, nobody is banning you for expressing your points of view there, unlike Fb & twitter. You have a âmute buttonâ if you get annoyed by some content certain accounts spam there permanently
And the description of Gab on wiki doesnt help anyhow to make any point related to the original issue of this thread. You just try to deflectâŚ
Big Tech platforms have rules. Since they are privately owned why does that bother you? Do you favor government regulation of free enterprise or should businesses set their own policies?
Rules are socialism! or something
Actually YOU are the one who totally missed the issue!
China isnt our ally, but a competitor, if not a very serious threat. The priority is our security, not the earnings of Big Tech. If they ally with China because they consider to do more money on that way, then pls move entirely to China, get them banned in the west. I also dont understand what has banning conservatives in the west to do with âworld markets realigningâ We also dont have to play accordingly to any markets reagligning so far this is in our disadvantage.
Also, your point about an open world, where there arent any enemies anymore, but only one big family, markets realigning according to that and so on, is totally hypocritically when we talk about our moral standards, as Big Tech comes into conflict with that standards when banning those who remembered the victims from Tienanmen⌠But you liberals dont care about moral standards anyways, do you?
Big Tech wants access to the huge Chinese market. In order to get it they have to comply with the demands of the Chinese government. None of the alternatives you listed is going to have any luck getting into the Chinese market without complying to the demands of their government. Kicking Facebook out of the US market is not going to solve the issue.
I should have included China and India in the original post. This is no secret to anyone in the big tech industry. I work as a software developer for a fortune 100 healthcare insurer, we have four Americans developers on our floor not counting managers and about 80+ people from India at a given time. Three times that amount are working offshore from India or on (back bench) in India either to come to America or work in and outsourced position when a position becomes available.
The way these outsourcing companies work is they have a manager who works on the floor with the software developers, if a particular project requires engineers they donât even bother trying to interview an American worker for the position the manager will tell the offshore manager how many developers they need for a certain project who then makes the call to bring the developers here for a set amount of time.
IBM is a big abuser, as are the rest of the big companies. The 70-80% numbers I have seen floating around come from offshore amounts which often are not reported when companies list who works there. Because technically they do not work for the company but the outsourcing company and example is âSyntelâ this is the company that pays them not IBM who they are working for.
2 Likes
They hijacked the public space on internet and use that monopoly in order to form opinions and meddle into elections in favour of DNC candidates. They made the ârulesâ and change them permanently in order to favour leftism. Moreover, their actions favorise enemies of USA&west
We had that already and as I said, you are free to move to China together with your beloved Big Tech
If you want access to our market you must stop all anti Chinese propaganda across all continents.
conservatives love their rules â just not anyone elseâs.
Bingo! We dont have to comply with the demands of a rogue regime ruled by the Chinese communist party. Period! Imagine that during the cold war any companies had favorised USSR, complying with their demands⌠Had any US government tolerated that?
As I said already, the earnings of Big Tech arent any priority. Move to China, get banned in the west, they would be removed immediately by other social media platforms
I said nothing of the sort. Please quote where I made these statements. Youâre making-up stuff. Is English your native language?
You seem to only be able to work on one track.
