Forget the warrant. It is the scheming behind the warrant that needs to come out. Using the FBI against Biden’s top political opponent is more important than some FBI policy Garland can change at will.
And Congress is not compelled to accept Garlands policies as an excuse.
Yeah- the GSA just randomly grabs papers and stuff and packs them up when a President departs the White House. There’s no plan or checklist or anything.
![]()
Because raiding the residency of the chief political opponent of the head of the executive branch needs to be explained. If Trump had the FBI raid Biden’s house before the election, looking for evidence on Hunter, you would likely understand.
Forget the warrant. It is the scheming behind the warrant that needs to come out. Using the FBI against Biden’s top political opponent is more important than some FBI policy Garland can change at will.
And Congress is not compelled to accept Garlands policies as an excuse.
The “scheming” is the legal process that was used to obtain the warrant.
If we could see the warrant we could see what they were looking for.
Only one party can show us the warrant.
The warrant would say we are looking for documents and have told a judge we have probable cause. Overused red herring.
FloridaYankee:
DougBH:
Garland needs to be subpoenaed today and answer every detail of what happened and why. Pelosi will of course not do this. It should be towards the top business staring in January.
Why?.
Because raiding the residency of the chief political opponent of the head of the executive branch needs to be explained. If Trump had the FBI raid Biden’s house before the election, looking for evidence on Hunter, you would likely understand.
The election is over two years out and he hasn’t even announced.
The warrant would say we are looking for documents and have told a judge we have probable cause. Overused red herring.
It would also State the nature of the documents.
The warrant would say we are looking for documents and have told a judge we have probable cause. Overused red herring.
The warrant will also say (very specifically) which documents are being sought, and where they are.
DougBH:
FloridaYankee:
DougBH:
Garland needs to be subpoenaed today and answer every detail of what happened and why. Pelosi will of course not do this. It should be towards the top business staring in January.
Why?.
Because raiding the residency of the chief political opponent of the head of the executive branch needs to be explained. If Trump had the FBI raid Biden’s house before the election, looking for evidence on Hunter, you would likely understand.
The election is over two years out and he hasn’t even announced.
Gee. The suspense as to whether he will run is so great.
Now, try to be serious.
Trump didn’t “take” any either, GSA shipped them.
How do you know? Why would GSA ship classified?
Garland needs to be subpoenaed today and answer every detail of what happened and why. Pelosi will of course not do this. It should be towards the top business staring in January.
Lordy, I would hope we find out what this is all about before January.
DougBH:
The warrant would say we are looking for documents and have told a judge we have probable cause. Overused red herring.
The warrant will also say (very specifically) which documents are being sought, and where they are.
Questionable, since they came out with boxes. That will not added much as why this tactic was used and who decided what when. Red herring to avoid the real questions by deflecting.
FloridaYankee:
DougBH:
FloridaYankee:
DougBH:
Garland needs to be subpoenaed today and answer every detail of what happened and why. Pelosi will of course not do this. It should be towards the top business staring in January.
Why?.
Because raiding the residency of the chief political opponent of the head of the executive branch needs to be explained. If Trump had the FBI raid Biden’s house before the election, looking for evidence on Hunter, you would likely understand.
The election is over two years out and he hasn’t even announced.
Gee. The suspense as to whether he will run is so great.
Now, try to be serious.
If it was six months before the election you’d have a point.
TheDoctorIsIn:
DougBH:
The warrant would say we are looking for documents and have told a judge we have probable cause. Overused red herring.
The warrant will also say (very specifically) which documents are being sought, and where they are.
Questionable, since they came out with boxes. That will not added much as why this tactic was used and who decided what when. Red herring to avoid the real questions by deflecting.
They supposed to stuff em down their pants?
Questionable, since they came out with boxes.
It’s a legal requirement that the warrant specifically identify what is being sought.
Why does the fact that “boxes” were used make that “questionable?”
That will not added much as why this tactic was used and who decided what when.
You are correct, it will not. That is the sort of information that won’t be released until the investigation is completed, for obvious reasons.
I have a point anyway. Everybody knows he is running and will secure the nomination. “I think a lot of people will be happy with my decision”. And the polls show he will be nominated.
Destroy him now. Why wait?
I understand was just wondering where he was going to go with the goal post or just drop out of the conversation
Yes. Cover up.
And FBI policy does not override the law if he is subpoenaed.
I have a point anyway. Everybody knows he is running and will secure the nomination. “I think a lot of people will be happy with my decision”. And the polls show he will be nominated.
Destroy him now. Why wait?
Who’s waiting? He’s getting hit on three fronts at the same time.
I understand was just wondering where he was going to go with the goal post or just drop out of the conversation
It was the secret service that was notified ahead of time, not the lawyers. That’s why they showed up late.