In his interview with NBC’s Meet The Press, Trump was asked whether he would rule out using force against the territory.
“I don’t rule it out. I don’t say I’m going to do it, but I don’t rule out anything. No, not there. We need Greenland very badly. Greenland is a very small amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll cherish them, and all of that. But we need that for international security,” Trump said.
Well, that’s sane.
There could be tens of casualties if we, “tAKe iT bY ForCE!” 
Sheople food…get your sheople food here. Orange man baaa, baaad. Sheople food here.
Do you think it’s sane for the POTUS to contemplate taking Greenland by force?
This should keep Libs busy for awhile…
I don’t think it will ever happen but…“I won’t rule it out”.
Libs.
This sounds like an order the military would refuse if it came down to it.
Then we got some serious problems.
I say we send in the all gay force to secure our new territory.
Maybe an all “trans” force if possible.
There have been too many battles fought with no “trans” troops. Time to even things out.
“We are the fabulous 2nd armored division!”
Don’t we already have a Greenland thread? Do we really need another?
This sounds like an imaginary order that will never be given.
No serious problem, except maybe a bit of frothing from LIBs.
Yeah I don’t even think Trump is that daft.
I think he will keep pressuring Denmark behind the scenes though. He seems to really want it.
We should take Mexico by force instead.
It makes me think of Stephen Miller, in his basement room, tweeting ■■■■ on Kentucky Derby Day:
Yes, sovereignty will win! Now give us Greenland you pukes!
Maybe he can pull a Putin and get giggity giggity quagmired in a much smaller, much weaker country for 3 years. That’s what strong, leaderly, non-woke leaders do.
We had a chance to do that back in the 1840s. Even those maniacs who lived by manifest destiny didn’t want to deal with that headache.
Hard pass
And mostly due to frostbite, trench foot and self-inflicted wounds. 
On what grounds?
