They elect this disgusting name calling king of bull ■■■■■■■■ narcissistic self loving hedonistic bolt throwing corrupt con man and then are all sadfacey that he gets negative coverage. Play ■■■■■■ games win ■■■■■■ prizes.
That’s true and you’ll recognize them when you hear…orange man baaa, baaa, baaad.
You don’t, despite the evidence to the contrary? Why not?
it’s mainly because they don’t expose themselves to any other sources of information, and the sources they do consume tell them that the other news outlets are wrong.
What other sources do you use?
Totally leftist? Newspapers might have left leaning editorials every once in a while, but they tend to be pretty neutral in most cities. Nothing compared to Fox News, MSNBC, or anyone on talk radio. And newspapers’ main customers are old people, who vote Republican.
I agree, the locals are good. It’s the nationals that are the problem. The bigger the city, the bigger the problem.
Newspapers are for old people, who don’t know how to check the internet to see how many hits their team got during the game they fell asleep to. Not many are being politically influenced by them.
Give me a break, most newspapers go out of their way not to be political.
I disagree.
You made me do all that scrolling for that? Come on!
The New York Times and Washington Post are definitely liberal. I can’t think of any other newspapers that have much influence.
No, they’ve stopped reading newspapers and watching network news…recently…because it’s too painful to learn that your choice for PoTUS is a deeply flawed human being and that you were totally wrong in your support of him.
Orrrrrr
They got tired of the whining about him.
Obviously some stories are political, so there inheritantly is going to be some politics in them. But people aren’t called names and personally attacked in newspapers the way they are on television and radio.
WuWei: Bodecea: Oldandtired:But it’s perfectly fine for some of you to judge conservatives and call them stupid because they believe different than you?
That’s not why.
Yes it is.
Nope.
Of course it is. Ignorant, less educated, unenlightened, not woke. You personally think you are smarter than every conservative on this forum, it comes across in every post you make. The same is true of all libs.
You know how condescending I am to you about guns? That’s how you guys are about EVERYTHING , including guns.
Kelby:No, they’ve stopped reading newspapers and watching network news…recently…because it’s too painful to learn that your choice for PoTUS is a deeply flawed human being and that you were totally wrong in your support of him.
Orrrrrr
They got tired of the whining about him.
Pretty sure it was along the lines of the regular AP Fact Checks feature.
The phrase “without evidence” was very commonly used to describe many of the contentions Trump made.
Kelby: gooddad409: Ex-Pat:Hard left? Like advocating late term abortions and private property seizure? Give me a break, most newspapers go out of their way not to be political.
And the left taking over all media? That’s hilarious given how many pro-Trump people are in the media. Ever heard of the Internet? You’re on it right now. It’s already killed most “hard left” newspapers.
I have to call BS. Have a nice day. I’m not wasting any more time with you.
In fact you are going on the ignore list.
Perfect example of what we are talking about in this thread…assuming you are serious.
You guys are the ones living in a bubble. Just a fact. Have a nice day.
It’s both sides and the media counts on it.
madasheck: WildRose:There’s more than one body involved and someone has to speak for the unborn if the mother won’t.
Since when did men start having babies?
If they did, abortion would be a lock…and in the Bill of Rights.
Would it? So there are no pro-life women?
Bodecea:90% biased because they are all against him…because?
They elect this disgusting name calling king of bull ■■■■■■■■ narcissistic self loving hedonistic bolt throwing corrupt con man and then are all sadfacey that he gets negative coverage. Play ■■■■■■ games win ■■■■■■ prizes.
Same things you © said about Bush and Reagan.
madasheck: gooddad409: DougBH:About 10 percent of Newspaper supported Trump as compared to nearly half of the voters. There is a disconnect between the owners and managers of newspapers and half of the American people.
Now, as to the response of the anti Trumpers to that small portion of the media that is not anti Trump, just see their attacks on Foxnews, or faux news as they call it.
The newspapers are almost totally leftist these days. And as you said there is a disconnect between them and 50 percent of the American people.
Truth has a liberal bias. In your world everything is wrong. That’s not the newspapers fault.
Liberal bias and truth are oxymorons. Complete opposites.
If that’s so, how come all the newspaper stories about Trump have been accurate and the right-wing spin has been consistently wrong?
Newspapers are for old people, who don’t know how to check the internet to see how many hits their team got during the game they fell asleep to. Not many are being politically influenced by them.
And yet the “newspapers” are all on the internet. Are you trying to claim the NYT and WP don’t influence you?
The New York Times and Washington Post are definitely liberal. I can’t think of any other newspapers that have much influence.
Look at the articles, how many say “AP”? Who is writing “AP”? The other are regurgitating.
I don’t have a subscription, so they’re not having much of an influence on me. But those are two examples out of hundreds of newspapers. The original discussion was that most newspapers are hard left.