So Nixon, Ford and Bush 2 were similarly spitting at 200 plus years of greatness or are they diffeRent?
1 Like
When did trump supporters try to slip in “no corruption” to the list?
1 Like
when democrats and the media started saying there’s “corruption” after they didnt get obstruction or collusion
they’re also saying “a cover up”.
but they have to. otherwise they’ll be calling for impeachment for nothing
America First.
Trump first. They are two sides of the same coin, after all.
We know there is corruption. We know people around trump are going to jail, we know people in his administration had to leave for the things they did, we know Trump has lied about Russia from no one in his campaign having anything to do with Russia to when talks of a trump tower in Moscow was going on to him writing Don Jrs statement about the trump tower meeting.
But NO CORRUPTION!
1 Like
Some reasons to think on: Pruitt, Price, Flynn, emoluments clause, obstruction of justice, Muller Report … Is that enough for you?
All the investigations are over?
Collusion/Obstruction is like Humpty Dumpty.
No collusion, no obstruction, no corruption, big hands, no complaints there!
I just read that we need to pay attention to “criminal” corruption, or lack there of.
Regular corruption is fake news.
1 Like
Are those available at the Trump Store? Or maybe the RNC?
Humpty is like the gopers. They are falling apart with all the daily scandals.
how could nothing be “enough?”
there are no trump crimes here sorry
flynn etc was purely political, in my opinion. but im sure you dont think petey strzok, page etc were biased
one major one is. but since that didnt pan out just investigate s’more huh?
lol. so obvious to the thinking man
Whatever page and strzok did pales next to Flynn, Price, Pruitt and Kushner. And if you want Trump directly, his firing of Comey and what led to it (telling him to back off of Flynn).
Think again.
So at least you don’t bow to the spin that all the investigations are over. One small step for thinkingman.
there was no legitimate predicate for the mueller investigation which turned up nothing.
how can there any legit predicate for any others?
your answer is “there isnt” but you dont care. investigations is all that matters
we’ll see how much it helps next year
meanwhile your heroes strozk and page, weirdo comey, clapper, brennan, and the rest are gettin a lil investigation of their own
msnbc taught you that this is “revenge” btw and abuse of doj, just in case you were confused.
The investigation did NOT turn up nothing.
The Russians responsible for hacking the DNC and meddling in our elections were identified and indicted.
Isn’t that a good thing?
And yes, I know, indicting them won’t in itself result in them being tried here, but it might put a crimp in their travel habits into a country where we have an extradition treaty.
Not much, but it’s all we can do to them.
