Trump is 15 million dollar richer

Talk to me Goose. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

You don’t get damages for pride. You get money for actual damages and or presumed damages. Then you have punitive damages. The latter two you usually don’t get much from. But with Trump you never know. It could be a lot. That’s why I think they settled.

Do you know how many times I had to hold my nose and vote for a democrat for governor in NJ? Mainly because the republican governors are so anti union, and take steps to make our lives miserable. That’s an actual real life reason. I can’t afford to vote for someone because of their race, gender, or if they are a nice person. I have to vote based on what they’ll do. Or not do.

That daughter you’re talking about. Did she even mention policy? Or just the reasons she didn’t like Trump?

Its a joke.

Now we know why they finaly got a divorce.

1 Like

Steppedinawfulstuff really messed up!

He’s the king of fake news. A propagandists right out of the Clinton Whitehouse.

ABC has had no credibility since they hired him…

3 Likes

Not sure what you mean by this?

The multiple books he has written are certainly in libraries. :roll_eyes:

1 Like

Those were ghost written :grinning:

Who’d you vote for if not Trump…Kamala? Anything you’d have against Trump…is NOT solved by voting for Kamala. In the world we live in, all a voter can do is vote for the lessor of the evils and in this case, there is NO QUESTION…it’s Trump.

1 Like

Now lib media is making itself out as victim…too funny.

8 Likes

Oh i would have voted for Harris. No doubt about it.

Of course you would…

2 Likes

She’s responding to your post…for me. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

Nothing could ever persuade me to vote for Trump but I agree with what Romney said a few days ago its Trump’s Republican Party now and Maga is the defining ideology.

Then learn that in situations like this, to set aside your feelings. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

1 Like

Note to journalists: When referring to Trump, you must not call him a rapist (even tho that’s common parlance for the activity). You must call him a sexual abuser. It was not demonstrated that he put his penis in her against her will, only his fingers.

As long as you call him a sexual abuser (and not a rapist) you’ll be giving a factual statement of what he has been held legally liable for doing.

2 Likes

that wasnt demonstrated either

go run to your “news”

1 Like

Man, some people’s college “educated” children. :rofl:

5 Likes