lol, there definitely is a pattern. The ankle thing is spot on. Also reminds me of a frustrated babysitter that the kids won’t listen to or take serious.
Those hippies over at Forbes are reporting that we have reached or are near reaching the crossover point where wind and solar are less expensive than coal.
So… does it make economic sense to generate power at a higher cost and higher pollution just because of politics?
New technologies are getting plenty of subsidies. What is still true, however, is that renewables are nowhere NEAR potent enough to replace fossile fuels and even if they were they are STILL unreliable.
You have to be able to rely on a constant minimal level of power in order to keep the nation at a certain level of comfort and production. There is just no way to make wind and solar reliable because we cannot control the weather and the Sun. Some days you get peek power for a good part of the day. Some days you are nowhere near it anytime of the day.
If you want to get rid of the reliable fossile fuels go nuclear, which is equally reliable.
Supplement your needs with any and every alternative you can afford to play with, (and they are not cheap - let’s be clear), but keep the reliables online at all times.
You will absolutely need them. It’s just a matter of how much you need them on any given day.
Yes, but it costs a lot of money to decommission and demolate old coal plants and it takes years and lots of money to build new natural gas plants and build the transportation pipelines to fuel them. You cannot just snap your fingers and make it happen overnight.