No. Why would you thInk that? You said wind generators made a farm look beautiful because they made money for the farmer. I simply wondered if you thought that oil derricks would make a farm beautiful for the same reason.
By the way, I think both make farms ugly. You can’t see the money.
For a moment there, I thought it was going to turn into a good discussion, but that was short lived. Bashing Trump is obviously more important than civil discussion.
I am truly fascinated with the flatearthers view on climate change and renewable energy more specifically.
Technology changes as more r&d goes in. For example, in 1969 an IBM 360/Model 25 mainframe cost about a quarter of a million US dollars and the main memory came in four sizes: 16,000, 24,000, 32,000 or 48,000 bytes!!!
There is very little evidence to show that he is smart. He articulates at a seven year level with a very limited vocabulary. He behaves petulantly like a seven year old when he doesn’t get his own way. He has shown virtually no empathy.
Turn into??? The OP started off bashing. Ditto the ensuing replies until someone challenged one of the bashes that tried to insert a fact – and even that one fact was was wrong.
Trump’s premise is that if the wind isn’t blowing a wind farm is useless. That is factually inaccurate, no matter what spin his supporters try to push. Period. No one outside trump supporters think he’s purposely stating inaccuraccies to troll dems, so there is only one other conclusion. Trump is not knowledgable on this subject.
I’m simply making a point. Most meaningful discussion takes place in a common frame of reference. That hasn’t been the case in this Trump bashing thread. It has been taking place in a frame of reference where Trump is a buffoon.
You still fail to see that you are stuck in a frame of reference where Trump is a buffoon. In order to join you in that frame of reference I would need to accept your characterization of Trump. I don’t, so there is really nothing further to discuss. I simply won’t join you there.