So cutting through the nonsense, the President threatened Raffensperger with some kind of criminal prosecution if he didnât conjure up enough votes for him to win and illegally change the election results, which is obviously a felony.
No. Thatâs not how this works - itâs not my job to disprove your claims.
I understand that your burden of proof is someone on youtube said so, and it makes me feel good to believe it - but here in the real world, thatâs not how it works.
No, it is not. He is not asking them to âcorrectâ their count - but fudge it so he wins. He specifically demanded they âfindâ exactly the number of votes he needs.
Youre right. Thatâs not how it works. If you allege a crime you have to prove itâŠbeyond a reasonable doubt.
And it takes a lot of interpreting and imagining to make it where he wanted to do anything other than find sufficient legal votes.
No. You donât âgot him this timeâ.
Actually, no. I donât have to do anything. The prosecutor has to prove it.
No, it really does not. It takes a lot more imagination to believe anything other than what clearly happened - Trump spent an hour threatening, begging, and otherwise debasing himself in an attempt to convince the SoS to commit large-scale voter fraud on his behalf.
Plausible deniability only goes so far - and this is well past that.
Theyâre also claiming this was an illegal recording because the discussion was part of a âconfidential election settlementâ (whatever that means).