Trump asked the Georgia secretary of state to "find" votes to overturn the results

1 Like

So cutting through the nonsense, the President threatened Raffensperger with some kind of criminal prosecution if he didn’t conjure up enough votes for him to win and illegally change the election results, which is obviously a felony.

Team Trump also asked to have their campaign lawyers deputized in Georgia so they could just do the damn thing themselves.

A real bright idea.

Post a link to an actual technical analysis that refutes the votes shifting the investigators found and Georgia and we can discuss.

It is entirely with Trump’s rights to demand that Georgia officials correct their vote count; the accusations against Trump are baseless.

No. That’s not how this works - it’s not my job to disprove your claims.

I understand that your burden of proof is someone on youtube said so, and it makes me feel good to believe it - but here in the real world, that’s not how it works.

No, it is not. He is not asking them to “correct” their count - but fudge it so he wins. He specifically demanded they “find” exactly the number of votes he needs.

It’s a felony.

7 Likes

Knowingly certifying false election results is a felony.

Demanding that false results be corrected is the remedy.

This is not “irrefutable” and there is no record of the “Data Integrity Group” outside of this “hearing”.

You guys will literally believe anything.

1 Like

It’s not illegal if the president doesn’t care if it’s illegal


Well no, it isn’t. It also didn’t happen.

No, it isn’t - it’s a crime.

Particularly since the results weren’t “false”.

Trump’s sad feelings = national security. Their ideal scenario is Trump gets to lie about phone calls and the other side should shut up.

It’s just that simple.

That’s the network some posters here are moving to for the truth.

There is no evidence that the vote was false.

We’re reached the “snitches get stiches” phase of the Trump presidency.

Youre right. That’s not how it works. If you allege a crime you have to prove it
beyond a reasonable doubt.
And it takes a lot of interpreting and imagining to make it where he wanted to do anything other than find sufficient legal votes.
No. You don’t “got him this time”.

Actually, no. I don’t have to do anything. The prosecutor has to prove it.

No, it really does not. It takes a lot more imagination to believe anything other than what clearly happened - Trump spent an hour threatening, begging, and otherwise debasing himself in an attempt to convince the SoS to commit large-scale voter fraud on his behalf.

Plausible deniability only goes so far - and this is well past that.

3 Likes

They’re also claiming this was an illegal recording because the discussion was part of a “confidential election settlement” (whatever that means).

Sigh


Trump had folks believing in fraud six months before it never happened. The man has talent.

That’s just what Kamala said, so you’re in good company.

Trump is just a fighter.