Aside from that the LEO is unable to access information on the individual thanks to NY.
LEO can’t find out if the person he has in front of him is wanted for a crime or known to be violent.
Cops must love this
Immigration is a federal issue. The Biden administration went out of its way to establish that in its battles with Texas.
Uh, huh…makes perfect sense…IF…you don’t apply any.
And James and Hochul will lose, they are on record saying they would not prosecute Tren Del Aragua
1 Like
Where in the constitution does it say that the Feds can tell a state to whom they can give drivers licenses? Let me know oh sensible one.
They really are the party of death. If an American is victimized, whether by another American or especially an illegal, they’re going to sympathize with the offender and to hell with the victim. They get outraged when an innocent person has the audacity to defend themselves against a violent attacker, to the point of arresting, charging and putting on trial people who do so.
If a mob breaks down your gate and fills your driveway and shouts repeatedly that they’re going to come in and kill you and burn your house down you damn well better let them do it in St. Louis, whatever you do, do not even display a weapon to deter the trespassing mob. If an 18 year old lawfully protects property from rioting mobs and they chase him, knock him down and repeatedly kick him in the head and finally pull a gun on him, he better wait until they kick him into unconsciousness or fire first before shooting back because he really had no justification to fear for his life and pull a gun. If a man attempts to stop a violent psychopath on a subway train who is shouting I’m going to kill everyone and the scumbag piece of ■■■■ accidentally dies as a result of his own actions, then they arrest the hero and try and put him in jail.
So why should we expect that the dumb ■■■■■ with no common sense believe police should have a legitimate right to know if the person they lawfully stopped has a warrant, or is a danger to everyone else in society?
2 Likes
Personally, I’m glad there isn’t actual language about this (or that we can directly apply to this.) The Constitution is about how our FEDERAL government should run. And (at least originally) at a pretty broad level.
Some States (mine included – Colorado) have ever-in-flux constitutions with language addressing details that, in my opinion, really doesn’t belong at that level.
Just my comment on that particular question. 
I haven’t been following along with the discussion you’re having with Smyrna. In my opinion, if it is the practice of a given state to issue drivers licenses to illegal immigrants, and if the fedgov doesn’t like that, then the fedgov can (and should) disallow drivers licenses from those states as valid IDs in airports and other places where an ID is required by them. Just flat out reject all of them. Require a passport (or some other federally-controlled ID) instead. The State can do what it wants on this matter, but the fedgov doesn’t (and shouldn’t) have to honor it if it violates federal law.
4 Likes
Why would anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together protect Tren Del Aragua????
The “D” in TDS has exploded since election day.
2 Likes
I don’t think they can.
But remember when the Feds wanted to have states make the speed limit 55? Courts were fine with the Feds cutting highway funding until they did.
Also, the states say they won’t let the Feds look at their list of drivers license recipients. That should last until some federal court issues a warrant if it is shown evidence of a crime can be provided.
And if NY does actually inform illegals they are being investigated we are into criminal territory for aiding and abetting and obstructions.
NY has a very thin ice between not assisting the Feds and assisting the illegals.
That and stopping the administration from exposing fraud, waste and abuse seem to be the Democrats master plan for 2026. We will see how well that works for,them.
2 Likes
About as well as 2024 probably.
For the same reason Dems and Biden took 151 of the 210 million from the Army Food budget for our soldiers and redirected to unknown entities. Liberals are crooks and felons and are pissed they are being audited.
4 Likes
Right. Because there are rarely consequences for doing either. Like stealing in NYC.
Oooh…certain licensing criteria as a requirement for federal highway funds.
1 Like
depends on what you are stealing in NYC.
go to the diamond district and try and steal some diamonds.
and see what happens.
Allan
I could nitpick speeding and hiring illegals too.
1 Like
Hopefully this money is recouped and directed back to the soldiers.
1 Like
Two bullies. They are probably shakin’ in their boots. That’s how bullies roll when confronted.
I don’t expect anything good from the left. Those responsible should be made to go hungry.
