The thread title is wrong.
It is more hearsay and eavesdropping.
Sondland must be using his speakerphone function with reckless abandon.
The thread title is wrong.
It is more hearsay and eavesdropping.
Sondland must be using his speakerphone function with reckless abandon.
Once the wh got wind of the wihistleblower complaint.
Allan
Impeached for what?..
The thread title is wrong.
It is more hearsay and eavesdropping.
Sondland must be using his speakerphone function with reckless abandon.
It is direct evidence of Sondland using his phone to talk to the president about Ukraine investigations on July 26.
Two direct witnesses.
Allan
Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
Cratic3947:They got the aid without an investigation
Once the wh got wind of the wihistleblower complaint.
Allan
Or…shortly before the budget period required release of the funds. But lets go the conspiracy theory route…its so much more fun.
“We hearby impeach the President for what we imagine might have happened if the whistle blower letter had not been released”
no
Cratic3947:Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
That’s right. There’s not requirement in the Constitution that the impeachment hast to be, like…sane.
Cratic3947:Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
So, after three years of intense study on why Trump is corrupt, you don’t know of anything… Got it…!
Cratic3947:Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
Getting it done is easier than saying it
biggestal99: Cratic3947:Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
So, after three years of intense study on why Trump is corrupt, you don’t know of anything… Got it…!
Well, we know that he had his personal lawyer break FEC laws. He’s probably got a sealed indictment waiting for him as soon as he leaves office. Just for that.
biggestal99: Cratic3947:Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
That’s right. There’s not requirement in the Constitution that the impeachment hast to be, like…sane.
Done Deal. Whats next?
Cratic3947: biggestal99: Cratic3947:Impeached for what?
Whatever the house deems appropriate and gets a majority vote.
Allan
So, after three years of intense study on why Trump is corrupt, you don’t know of anything… Got it…!
Well, we know that he had his personal lawyer break FEC laws. He’s probably got a sealed indictment waiting for him as soon as he leaves office. Just for that.
One? Its gonna be a flood gate for him and family and colleagues.
Cratic3947:Yes, It’s Trumps job to investigate corruption like Biden’s bribery for aid…
Hence he will be impeached.
Trump did his job.
The house will do theirs.
Then the senate will do theirs.
Nice and neat.
Allan
Tie Score!
No, we don’t know that…
Dems used the IRS to remove reps free speech in 2012…
You know what else the President of the Ukraine said?
He said he had no desire to be dragged into the middle of an American election
According to Kent or Taylor. I guess we need the Ukrainian President to confirm that allegation. When you have a bunch of people, who have been proven to have been coordinating their lies, making fresh pronouncements, their hearsay reports no longer have any reliability.
They got the aid without an investigation …
They got the aid without an investigation …
JayJay:You know what else the President of the Ukraine said?
He said he had no desire to be dragged into the middle of an American election
According to Kent or Taylor. I guess we need the Ukrainian President to confirm that allegation. When you have a bunch of people, who have been proven to have been coordinating their lies, making fresh pronouncements, their hearsay reports no longer have any reliability.
No…he said that in the press conference with Trump.
JayJay:You know what else the President of the Ukraine said?
He said he had no desire to be dragged into the middle of an American election
According to Kent or Taylor. I guess we need the Ukrainian President to confirm that allegation. When you have a bunch of people, who have been proven to have been coordinating their lies, making fresh pronouncements, their hearsay reports no longer have any reliability.
The only witness that had to change their testimony is the guy with direct communication with the President. The ones you say have “coordinated their lies” seem to have been honest and correct. The guy with direct evidence had to change his testimony to be in line with the hearsay.
In this case it looks like hearsay has been more reliable.
Or…shortly before the budget period required release of the funds. But lets go the conspiracy theory route…its so much more fun.
“We hearby impeach the President for what we imagine might have happened if the whistle blower letter had not been released”
no
They still held the funds, how or why they released them on that day isn’t yet confirmed. It’s just a huge coinkydink that it happened immediately after the reports. But why they released them, doesn’t matter.
The held them so that Trump can get a investigation into conspiracy theory announced.
That’s right. There’s not requirement in the Constitution that the impeachment hast to be, like…sane.
Sane,insane.
There will be a senate trial, John Robert presiding.
Allan