what court should we go to for permission to kill members of an enemy organization?
1 Like
-
Clinging to the wreckage . . . . the wreckage is a fair target, espec if the survivors were trying to right the boat.
-
However, the order “kill everybody” is likely to convince any jury that the 2nd target was not the wreckage, it was the survivors. That is wrong. That should not be done.
Retreating from a battlefield on land = fair target.
shipwrecked at sea = must be aided, cannot be shot.
That’s not me, and it is not “International Law” (fictitious imaginary idea except as a metaphor). It is the 2nd Geneva Convention, which the United States signed on December 8, 1949, and formally ratified it on August 2, 1955.
I can’t wait to until President Newsom identifies the RNC as an enemy organization.
so what if he does? its not a foreign terrorist organization so calling it that enhances no powers. learn the law
1 Like
Oh it’s a foreign terrorist organization. Newsom said so.
Only the President gets to make that determination.
Also proud boys, maga nd the most devious of them all…pepsico
It’ll be great! Precedent all set, just need to start sending in the drones.
Good thing we learned the law.
1 Like
And remember, nothing is illegal if the president seems it under his powers…SCOTUS saw to that one
Yes you should learn thew law.
Thee relevant statutes governing what actions may be taken against foreign terrorist organizations was posted in this thread.
I’ll reiterate the salient points.
1- The President does not have the power to unilaterally decide an organization is a a foreign terrorist organization. He doesn’t have the power to do so at all, actually.
He may direct the Secretary of State to make that declaration, but there is a set procedure for doing so that requires consultation with Congress…and a valid reason for labelling an organization as such is not “the President says they are”. Oh…and Congress can revoke the designation at any time.
2- once designated, the Administration may:
a- cut off/seize the organization's assets
b- bring charges against and prosecute anyone that aids and abets the organization
c- cut off all immigration of anyone belonging to or related to that organization
You know what the President CANNOT do according to that statute?
Unilaterally decide to kill or use military force against that organization for any reason OTHER than immediate or imminent danger.
And again…it stretches all credibility to pretend a boat that was hooking up with another boat that was headed to Suriname posed an immediate and imminent threat to the United States or its military forces.
That’s the law.
Learn it.
1 Like
An incursion is an attack. Sneaking drugs in to sell to eager customers is not an attack.
What’s an ‘enemy organization’?
Is that a story line in an upcoming fictional film?
I cant wait for President Newsome’s continuation of the destruction of this great nation in the name of progress.
■■■■■■■ idiots. 
Don’t worry, he probably won’t deport you or revoke your citizenship. But you might consider being careful just in case.
It’s a Hallmark movie.
1 Like
Yeah, thanks.
Thats the least of my worries with idiots.
1 Like
Because drug users are a major source of both property crimes and crimes against persons. If every drug user died before their addiction caused them to commit crimes to support their habit it wouldn’t bother me at all.
Your attitude is very close to the “sexy dresses cause rape” rationale.
2 Likes
Yes, and taking them out incidentally to destroying their transport and illicit products is one of them.
Quit trying to put words in my mouth with your strawman questions. I have told you before, I’m not going to play that game.