If you work for Trump and end up hating him, you can’t be a loyal American?
By firing James Comey, Trump has put impeachment on the table
A whiff of obstruction of justice is in the air.
If you work for Trump and end up hating him, you can’t be a loyal American?
Especially since the lack of swamp-draining showed it to be the vapid slogan that it was.
Scratch: Call_me_Ishmael:Why. Because Trump threatened their swamp.
That’s always the convenient go to excuse…
Especially since the lack of swamp-draining showed it to be the vapid slogan that it was.
You© mother ■■■■■■■ threated to impeach him if he did.
You© mother ■■■■■■■ threated to impeach him if he did.
Really? I missed the part where draining the swamp was an impeachable offense
Call_me_Ishmael:You© mother ■■■■■■■ threated to impeach him if he did.
Really? I missed the part where draining the swamp was an impeachable offense
Yeah. You missed it. Sorry you were not paying attention.
A whiff of obstruction of justice is in the air.
And that was just the beginning of warnings of impeachment.
Stop gaslighting. The internet has a memory.
The disgusting progs called every attempt to drain the swamp “obstruction of justice”.
No… we called firing the guy investigating him obstruction. Get it right…
Samm:There ya go!
Thankfully I will be alive in Communist Canada when the tiger you kept feeding bite your hand off.
I suppose that made sense when you wrote it. Try reading it now that the fleeting cleverness that spawned it has gone.
Samm:Have you forgotten what he did on January 6th?
I have completely forgotten.
What did he do?
I’m not your huckleberry either.
Supreme_War_Pig: Scratch: Call_me_Ishmael:Why. Because Trump threatened their swamp.
That’s always the convenient go to excuse…
Especially since the lack of swamp-draining showed it to be the vapid slogan that it was.
You© mother ■■■■■■■ threated to impeach him if he did.
Sure, sure.
Alternate theory: he had his own swamp of grifters and sycophants in mind.
Jezcoe: Call_me_Ishmael:You© mother ■■■■■■■ threated to impeach him if he did.
Really? I missed the part where draining the swamp was an impeachable offense
Yeah. You missed it. Sorry you were not paying attention.
By firing James Comey, Trump has put impeachment on the table - Vox
And that was just the beginning of warnings of impeachment.
Stop gaslighting. The internet has a memory.
The disgusting progs called every attempt to drain the swamp “obstruction of justice”.
Well… firing him was a thing that was universally decried and brought down the Mueller Investigation on him from Rosenstien who Trump did appoint… so there is that.
Jezcoe: Samm:Have you forgotten what he did on January 6th?
I have completely forgotten.
What did he do?
I’m not your huckleberry either.
I guess he didn’t do anything then.
No… we called firing the guy investigating him obstruction. Get it right…
You had the entire FBI and intelligence agencies investigating him.
Call_me_Ishmael: Jezcoe: Call_me_Ishmael:You© mother ■■■■■■■ threated to impeach him if he did.
Really? I missed the part where draining the swamp was an impeachable offense
Yeah. You missed it. Sorry you were not paying attention.
By firing James Comey, Trump has put impeachment on the table - Vox
And that was just the beginning of warnings of impeachment.
Stop gaslighting. The internet has a memory.
The disgusting progs called every attempt to drain the swamp “obstruction of justice”.
Well… firing him was a thing that was universally decried and brought down the Mueller Investigation on him from Rosenstien who Trump did appoint… so there is that.
Swamp.
Samm: Jezcoe: Samm:Have you forgotten what he did on January 6th?
I have completely forgotten.
What did he do?
I’m not your huckleberry either.
I guess he didn’t do anything then.
That’s the lib way. Put your fingers in your ears, close your eyes tightly … and bury your head in the sand.
Perhaps because @Call_me_Ishmael took pity on you and gave you the information you asked for, instead of me, it doesn’t count, right? That’s also a lib tactic. Apparently, you know them all.
Supreme_War_Pig:Wasn’t he reassuring China that an attack would not be forthcoming
Nice try. But …no.
He assured them that he would would give them advance warning if there were one.
Yeah. That’s treason.
like when they gave Russia advance warring before they bombed a Russian used airbase in Syria?
Perhaps because @Call_me_Ishmael took pity on you and gave you the information you asked for, instead of me, it doesn’t count, right? That’s also a lib tactic. Apparently, you know them all.
Didn’t see it.
Where was the treason?
Call_me_Ishmael: Supreme_War_Pig:Wasn’t he reassuring China that an attack would not be forthcoming
Nice try. But …no.
He assured them that he would would give them advance warning if there were one.
Yeah. That’s treason.
like when they gave Russia advance warring before they bombed a Russian used airbase in Syria?
Now don’t you go injecting commonsense into a run of posts about treachery!
CanadianJudo: Call_me_Ishmael: Supreme_War_Pig:Wasn’t he reassuring China that an attack would not be forthcoming
Nice try. But …no.
He assured them that he would would give them advance warning if there were one.
Yeah. That’s treason.
like when they gave Russia advance warring before they bombed a Russian used airbase in Syria?
Now don’t you go injecting commonsense into a run of posts about treachery!
I mean… basically if there was treason, then that means that we would all be fine with the President ordering an unprovoked surprise attack against a country where we are no where close to being at war with.
Which was the run of the argument back when this first came to light.
For what it’s worth, I was (and am) against letting the Mad King incinerate King’s Landing.
Which was the run of the argument back when this first came to light.
For what it’s worth, I was (and am) against letting the Mad King incinerate King’s Landing.
Yep… we would all have to accept that the President has the right to provoke a war on the way out the door.
It’s nuts.