I didn’t criticize a moderation. You keep asserting that. Doesn’t make it true. You’re doubling down on mind reading in regard to a poster who has never, in 14 years, approached COM.
The initial reference was valid.
What exactly did you say?
Dem: conan:What did that NRA thread had to do with president?
If you’re referring to Trumps Charity organization, the point was to reference it as an example. Some people weren’t sure if NY could dissolve the NRA charity organization, so Trumps charity was brought up as a recent example.
And it was, nothing was said, then what happened?
https://community.hannity.com/t/general-slop-from-various-threads/233780/125?u=dem
You moved the post over to slop.
Nemesis:That is what we all want. We enjoy posting here and many of us have posted here for well over a decade and want to continue posting here.
I disagree. And again, we are talking about the Politics Forum.
Nemesis:instead of constantly defending your position, take a step back and consider the fact that quite possibly in a desire to try and make this forum better have made it worse.
I’m not defending anything. I’m asking and clarifying.
Nemesis:The incessant “good posts” and “keep on track” while done with the best of intentions just reinforce the micromanagement. If you are actively particpating in a thread as a poster then let another mod do the moderating. We certainly have more than enough mods to do that.
Fine, you want no more Mod Notes, no more Mod Notes. We’ll just wait and the posts will disappear. I will not apologize for saying good post. The moderating in the thread has been addressed several times. No.
Nemesis:Its ironic that you were one of the most vocal to complain when your threads were moved from politics fo vague reasons and now you have taken that to a whole new level.
Have I? Which posts threads have I moved to another forum?
Nemesis:This forum has never been so polarized as it is today and the idiotic sections such as slop or fever dreams and TDS are as others pointed ou insulting and demeaning which encourages the cycle of polarization.
You collectively were warned several times to stop. You collectively didn’t. You wanted to troll, we gave you a place to do it.
Nemesis:As I keep saying I understand what you are trying to do but its not working.
Why not?
Nemesis:When you created this thread I know it was a genuine desire to improve the level of discussion but because of everything else that has been implemented since you became a mod it is being perceived as sneaky just wanting to micromanage and control the forum more.
You’re mistake is believing we don’t discuss things or I do what I want.
Dude I give up. Its obvious you are hell bent on doing things your way and as a mod thats your prerogative but its ■■■■■■■ up the forum.
When I talked about moving threads I mispoke I should have said posts. The number of posts that get moved to the insulting sub sections are insane and its mainly you doing it. But my point remains that you now indulge in the very mod behavior that you were once critical of.
I do appreciate the opportunity to have my say. I just hope you and the other mods reflect on all the comments made.
What exactly did you say?
I asked why a thread whose OP was garbage and whose contents contained multitude examples of trolling wasn’t sent to the trolling section. Could it be because I agree that some things should be sent into oblivion, or side discussions? Or is it more likely that a spot free poster of 14 years just all of a sudden decided to COM?
If you thought the post ought to belong somewhere else, a simple mod note could have accomplished that.
Shoot, you could have shot the post over to the slop thread. Instead, you decide to issue a TO.
Jezcoe:The only response to my quip was that you said that you were actually tough.
That is not a threat at all, much less physical. That is a simple statement of fact.
As a mod and if you saw this would this be a threat or not.
Usually when making an argument one tries not to be obtuse. Laying out one’s case effectively does not include asking questions and expecting the answer that one wants and when that answer doesn’t appear claim some sort of weird victory. You are resisting because the truth is inconvenient to The Narrative. Don’t go to SERE Training. Back in the day I’d have put you on your knees for that.
Cause putting someone on their knees seems like a physical threat to me.
Oh wait.
I can see how the excuses are going to be made.
But you see my man… I would never in a million years type something like that to a stranger on the internet.
There was a line that was crossed.
People saw it.
That is one of the reasons why this crackdown on whatever happens to constitute “trolling” from day to day is not taken seriously at all.
But really guys.
Keep on this path. It is the way to drive long term posters away.
Yours was the third one. After two warnings.
WuWei: Nemesis:That is what we all want. We enjoy posting here and many of us have posted here for well over a decade and want to continue posting here.
I disagree. And again, we are talking about the Politics Forum.
Nemesis:instead of constantly defending your position, take a step back and consider the fact that quite possibly in a desire to try and make this forum better have made it worse.
I’m not defending anything. I’m asking and clarifying.
Nemesis:The incessant “good posts” and “keep on track” while done with the best of intentions just reinforce the micromanagement. If you are actively particpating in a thread as a poster then let another mod do the moderating. We certainly have more than enough mods to do that.
Fine, you want no more Mod Notes, no more Mod Notes. We’ll just wait and the posts will disappear. I will not apologize for saying good post. The moderating in the thread has been addressed several times. No.
Nemesis:Its ironic that you were one of the most vocal to complain when your threads were moved from politics fo vague reasons and now you have taken that to a whole new level.
Have I? Which posts threads have I moved to another forum?
Nemesis:This forum has never been so polarized as it is today and the idiotic sections such as slop or fever dreams and TDS are as others pointed ou insulting and demeaning which encourages the cycle of polarization.
You collectively were warned several times to stop. You collectively didn’t. You wanted to troll, we gave you a place to do it.
Nemesis:As I keep saying I understand what you are trying to do but its not working.
Why not?
Nemesis:When you created this thread I know it was a genuine desire to improve the level of discussion but because of everything else that has been implemented since you became a mod it is being perceived as sneaky just wanting to micromanage and control the forum more.
You’re mistake is believing we don’t discuss things or I do what I want.
Dude I give up. Its obvious you are hell bent on doing things your way and as a mod thats your prerogative but its ■■■■■■■ up the forum.
When I talked about moving threads I mispoke I should have said posts. The number of posts that get moved to the insulting sub sections are insane and its mainly you doing it. But my point remains that you now indulge in the very mod behavior that you were once critical of.
I do appreciate the opportunity to have my say. I just hope you and the other mods reflect on all the comments made.
No, don’t give up. You’ve won. No more Mod Notes. No more warnings.
In the discussion thread. This forum or PM.
I might have been quick on you, there were several. If so, my apologies.
Please remember, we are not going to discuss, question, complain about moderation in a discussion thread. CF or PM.
Yours was the third one. After two warnings.
The warning to stay on topic? The post is on topic. Why does it matter if it was the third one? Are we limiting the amount of people who can post on topic information now?
WuWei: Jezcoe:The only response to my quip was that you said that you were actually tough.
That is not a threat at all, much less physical. That is a simple statement of fact.
As a mod and if you saw this would this be a threat or not.
Coronavirus Thread Political II - #2789 by WuWei
Cause putting someone on their knees seems like a physical threat to me.
Oh wait.
I can see how the excuses are going to be made.
But you see my man… I would never in a million years type something like that to a stranger on the internet.
There was a line that was crossed.
People saw it.
That is one of the reasons why this crackdown on whatever happens to constitute “trolling” from day to day is not taken seriously at all.
But really guys.
Keep on this path. It is the way to drive long term posters away.
SERE School is training. Not a fight. If you didn’t understand, you could have asked.
I will say this, it’s my fault for using military terminology with civilians. Old habits die hard.
My apologies for that.
WuWei:Yours was the third one. After two warnings.
The warning to stay on topic? The post is on topic. Why does it matter if it was the third one? Are we limiting the amount of people who can post on topic information now?
It was the third reference to Trump case. A link with “charity”.
Yes, the warning. The point was made.
Jezcoe: WuWei: Jezcoe:The only response to my quip was that you said that you were actually tough.
That is not a threat at all, much less physical. That is a simple statement of fact.
As a mod and if you saw this would this be a threat or not.
Coronavirus Thread Political II - #2789 by WuWei
Cause putting someone on their knees seems like a physical threat to me.
Oh wait.
I can see how the excuses are going to be made.
But you see my man… I would never in a million years type something like that to a stranger on the internet.
There was a line that was crossed.
People saw it.
That is one of the reasons why this crackdown on whatever happens to constitute “trolling” from day to day is not taken seriously at all.
But really guys.
Keep on this path. It is the way to drive long term posters away.
SERE School is training.
Put your mod hat on.
Is it on?
Is it firmly on?
If you saw a poster say that they would put another poster “on their knees” would that be threat or not?
Other people than you and I can see this and read this.
So what is the answer?
Keep in mind it’s not just the left here that Mods have to satisfy…it’s also the right.
In case you all haven’t noticed lot of those on right don’t post out in the open.
This forum isn’t here to suit just the left needs. Here is change for “some” to compromise with the right for change.
Some here claim Sneak is bias, OK. Well I hear differently. They say Sneak has been to quick to give them mod notes. Some even feel they have target on em.
So here is my challenge. Go back and find last 25 mod notes he gave out…and count which side those notes were directed at.
This is Conservative forum. If you’re really here to debate issues honestly…we’re waiting. But that’s two way street.
Now who here is willing to openly admit that AG in New York going after NRA is politically motivated?
WuWei: Jezcoe: WuWei: Jezcoe:The only response to my quip was that you said that you were actually tough.
That is not a threat at all, much less physical. That is a simple statement of fact.
As a mod and if you saw this would this be a threat or not.
Coronavirus Thread Political II - #2789 by WuWei
Cause putting someone on their knees seems like a physical threat to me.
Oh wait.
I can see how the excuses are going to be made.
But you see my man… I would never in a million years type something like that to a stranger on the internet.
There was a line that was crossed.
People saw it.
That is one of the reasons why this crackdown on whatever happens to constitute “trolling” from day to day is not taken seriously at all.
But really guys.
Keep on this path. It is the way to drive long term posters away.
SERE School is training.
Put your mod hat on.
Is it on?
Is it firmly on?
If you saw a poster say that they would put another poster “on their knees” would that be threat or not?
Other people than you and I can see this and read this.
So what is the answer?
I added to it.
No, it is not a physical threat. I can see how you would think it is. I was unclear and for being unclear, I apologize.
Intent vs. Impact.
As a mod, I would ask. Give a Mod Note and require an edit.
Jezcoe: WuWei: Jezcoe: WuWei: Jezcoe:The only response to my quip was that you said that you were actually tough.
That is not a threat at all, much less physical. That is a simple statement of fact.
As a mod and if you saw this would this be a threat or not.
Coronavirus Thread Political II - #2789 by WuWei
Cause putting someone on their knees seems like a physical threat to me.
Oh wait.
I can see how the excuses are going to be made.
But you see my man… I would never in a million years type something like that to a stranger on the internet.
There was a line that was crossed.
People saw it.
That is one of the reasons why this crackdown on whatever happens to constitute “trolling” from day to day is not taken seriously at all.
But really guys.
Keep on this path. It is the way to drive long term posters away.
SERE School is training.
Put your mod hat on.
Is it on?
Is it firmly on?
If you saw a poster say that they would put another poster “on their knees” would that be threat or not?
Other people than you and I can see this and read this.
So what is the answer?
I added to it.
No, it is not a physical threat. I can see how you would think it is. I was unclear and for being unclear, I apologize.
Intent vs. Impact.
Good to know.
Things are cool when one retroactively changes points from months ago to make it seem better. But the original still exists.
Pretty sad dude.
Just remember this when the question is asked as to why no one takes the moderation seriously.
Dem: WuWei:Yours was the third one. After two warnings.
The warning to stay on topic? The post is on topic. Why does it matter if it was the third one? Are we limiting the amount of people who can post on topic information now?
It was the third reference to Trump case. A link with “charity”.
Yes, the warning. The point was made.
Were the quotations an issue? Are we at a point, where even on topic posts can get moved, if too many make a similar post?
Good to know.
Just remember this when the question is asked as to why no one takes the moderation seriously.
That question hasn’t been asked. Will you take moderation seriously from the others? You want me to quit?
WuWei: Dem: WuWei:Yours was the third one. After two warnings.
The warning to stay on topic? The post is on topic. Why does it matter if it was the third one? Are we limiting the amount of people who can post on topic information now?
It was the third reference to Trump case. A link with “charity”.
Yes, the warning. The point was made.
Were the quotations an issue? Are we at a point, where even on topic posts can get moved, if too many make a similar post?
Yes, when it is off topic.