The new owner of The Onion has been bringing it back into relevance, like bringing back print editions. This time, he bought Infowars assets at the bankruptcy auction. The link is to his letter explaining his decision.
1 Like
That is absolutely hilarious. A satire news site bought another satire news site that took itself way too seriously.
5 Likes
Speaking of InfowarsâŚ
I think what he said on air was despikable.
NO question about it.
BUTâŚI donât understand why what he said, as despicable and evil as it is, WHY wasnât that free speach.
If Kamala can name Trump a Fashist and live to tell about it why isnât what he at the Infowars said ALSO free speach?
BOTH are baseless opinions, what is the difference?
Only in America⌠
Someone pays Millions to buy âAIRâ. 
People do it every day on the stock market.
1 Like
Learn the difference between âpublic figureâ and âprivate citizenâ and see why this is not allowed.
What is permissible to do to GW Bush you cannot do to an ordinary citizen.
How do you think Mark Cuban made his money?
1 Like
Stop the presses. The court denied the deal because of shenanigans by the trustee and families. A hearing to be held next week.
This is getting interesting.
1 Like
I donât know why they did this. Alex Jones is Infowars. Without him, itâs nothing.
LOL
Founded in 1999 on the heels of the Satanic âpanicâ and growing steadily ever since, InfoWars has distinguished itself as an invaluable tool for brainwashing and controlling the masses. With a shrewd mix of delusional paranoia and dubious anti-aging nutrition hacks, they strive to make life both scarier and longer for everyone, a commendable goal. They are a true unicorn, capable of simultaneously inspiring public support for billionaires and stoking outrage at an inept federal state that can assassinate JFK but canât even put a man on the Moon.
defamation is not allowed under the first amendment.
its a civil offense.
both trump and jones learned the hard way.
Allan
1 Like
I donât disagree, but there is attachment to the name brand in the sense that it was used for a long time.
I live the people who claim that government is incapable of doing anything right but is somehow capable of âengineering consentâ in a country of 330 million.
1 Like
Iâm more inclined to think that this violated his 1A rights.
1 Like
It was a default judgment entered in for a defamation case after the defense refused to doâŚsomething. Still feels like BS, but Jones also shouldnât have played belligerent.
1 Like
Found a story as opposed to a Twitter post where I first saw it.
Well sure. But it means nothing. Itâs like Judas Priest losing their lead singer. Game over. Everybody moved to where he went.
So does that mean that Trump can win a defamation suit against all who called him a Fashist?
1 Like
