No he is saying that he wants her to be shot. If I, can say Biden ■■■■■■ up by calling trump supporters garbage then its easy enough for Trump supporters to say Trump ■■■■■■ up with this.
No one has ever described a chicken hawk like this:
“Let’s put her with rifles standing there with nine barrels shooting at her ok? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.”
At an event late Thursday in Arizona with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Trump was asked whether it was strange to see Cheney campaign against him. The former Wyoming congresswoman has vocally opposed Trump since the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and endorsed Democrat Kamala Harris, joining the vice president at recent stops as they try to win over Republicans disaffected with Trump.
Trump called Cheney “a deranged person” and added, “But the reason she couldn’t stand me is that she always wanted to go to war with people. If it were up to her we’d be in 50 different countries.”
The former president continued: "She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her.
Just like the rest of the left these days, you all want to assign motive and put words and thoughts/intentions onto other people, but you suck at it.
You suddenly left our exchange yesterday when you tried to silence me using the phrase “talking points” and I called you out with all the stuff that Harris and Biden have been responsible for.
Compared to the ■■■■ show known as Joe and Kamala his presidency was far superior.
Now…you complain that we don’t wallow around with you lefties condemning him for every little thing that bothers you lefties…
There in lies the problem.
Time and again the thing you lefties are all up in arms about turns out to be somewhere between an out of context misrepresentation and an outright lie.
He knows that you clowns are going to pee your pants when he says something like he said about Cheney…Rush used to speculate that he just liked pushing your buttons.
The first post that referenced this story quoted a dishonest story saying he advocated her being shot or some such thing. He said no such thing. He said he wondered how she would feel, war monger that she is and one of the reasons she is no longer a republican member of congress by the way so we take care of ours at the ballot box apparently, how she would feel if she were the one with the guns pointed at her.
Now…while I’m venting…
How many times has Trump faced an assassination attempt recently? How many times have you people described him as an unhinged Hitler loving dictator wanna be nazi?
I honesty have no interest in being lectured about our language as Trump voters and my candidate’s language by libs and the Democrat party.
He had a call to action to get nine guns shooting at her. Direct words. I don’t give a rat’s ass what his rationale was.
Entirely separate sentence. "Let’s put her with rifles standing there with nine barrels shooting at her ok? "
I’ll give you another example, in a single sentence with a dependent clause that y’all are insistent that the dependent clause does not apply to the call to action.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
You guys keep doing it. You know people can watch the video for themselves and see exactly what he said, right? She’s a war hawk. It’s pretty evident, but please, continue the faux outrage. It’s hilarious.
I don’t give a ■■■■ what his reason for saying “Let’s put her with rifles standing there with nine barrels shooting at her ok?” Doesn’t ■■■■■■■ matter.