The house select committee on Jan 6

Politics
6380

What do you think Trump was doing? What was his goal?

…

Part one: Trump repeatedly and aggressively lied to the public falsely claiming the 2020 election was stolen from him.

Part two: Corruption of Justice Dept. --Trump sought to replace the Acting Attorney General with a loyalist so as to weaponize DOJ to use the force of the law to support his election lies.

Part three: Trump corruptly and repeatedly pressured Vice President Mike Pence to violate the U.S. Constitution and the law by refusing to count certified electoral votes on January 6

Part four: Trump improperly pressured state election officials and legislators to change their states’ election results and undermine the will of the voters in their states by flipping the state from Biden to Trump.

Part five: Trump’s team, including his lawyers, told GOPers across the country to manufacture fake slates of electors and send those fake elector slates to the U.S. Congress and the National Archives.

Part six: Trump summoned and assembled a mob of supporters to D.C. and directly told them to march to the US Capitol.

Part seven: Despite the violence against police and in the Capitol, Trump ignored myriad pleas for help and folks begging him to take immediate action to stop the violence and tell the MAGA mob to leave the Capitol.

6381

I don’t think so. Pols don’t like cannibals

6382

Not so.

6383

Time to put the fences back up.

Anybody know where to buy buffalo hats in female sizes?

1 Like
6384

Not being successful in getting Trump out of the way

1 Like
6385

Excellent argument for the 2A.

1 Like
6386

They’re screwing up.

1 Like
6387

6226 :raised_hand::stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye::raised_back_of_hand:

1 Like
6389

Must have run out of gas in you argument (I can understand because it’s so high) to derail 150 years.

6390

good! cant wait to see what folliws

so much for “always”

you’re upset with trump’s methods. not his claims

6391

Won’t get an argument from me, but that’s a different discussion.

6392

Nope, calling ■■■■■■■■ . You guys have been attacking the EC for years. That’s your wheelhouse all day.

1 Like
6393

Whether or not it would have succeeded…it was an attempt to do it.

Would have made Hayes/Tilden (which is why we have the Electoral Count Act in the first place) look like a picnic.

6394

I won’t vote for him in the primary.

I will in the general.

With the Democratic party infiltrated with “proggies”, you can’t trust a one of them.

1 Like
6395

Anything but Biden is the word on the street.

3 Likes
6396

Exactly!

Everytime they lose a major election.

1 Like
6397

hillary literally went around the world claiming trump was illegit pres

doesnt register on your meter i guess

2 Likes
6398

No his claims were without foundation.

It’s the claims that are the problem.

As far as “questioning the election goes”.

His methods…attempting to coerce state and local officials…attempting to create fake slates of electors…his attempts to get Mike Pence to do what Mike Pence didn’t have the power to do…aren’t about “questioning the election “

6399

what “foundation?”. who decides what the “foundation” is? Well how incredibly convenient

really? well my goodness. i thought his incitement to coup was the problem. Again, mixed messages…

He wanted everyone including Pence to consider the irregularities.

“always question” they used to say. just a mere few posts ago

see?!

6400

Foundation = Evidence. He had none…not even enough to begin a cursory investigation. In none of the many court cases he attempted did he even once submit evidence. That’s neither convenient nor inconvenient…it’s the truth.

No…he wanted Pence to throw out electoral votes…which Mike Pence had no authority to do.

There existed only one method of “questioning electoral votes”…it doesn’t involve the Vice-president in any way, shape or form.

He wanted to send fake electors to DC. That is not “questioning irregularities”.

I’m sure in your Unreality Bubble you think it is.