no just searching for the truth. unlike your precious “hearings”
1 Like
have any of them faced charges yet?
1 Like
No you have an assumed “truth”.
I read all the posts, even if I don’t respond to them all.
btw how many officers related to this break in have committed suicide?
is it 4?
man thats a lot of suicide
couple of them not till several months after right?
1 Like
Please ignore Epps directing them there and his likely accomplices removing police barricades.
1 Like
How does one ignore what’s imagined - the likely accomplices part?
He spoke to them before they did it.
Did he? He told them to take selfies with them. He told them to let some of them break windows
Amazing.
All powerful Ray Epps.
1 Like
See the Epps story has been completely called into question and you’re still buying it.
Defense mechanism.
Poor law abiding Trump supporters duped into misbehaving.
1 Like
Hilarious, completely called into question because Epps denies it lol.
3 Likes
Yeah craziness. Many have pled guilty and said they feel remorse for their actions. Hell some have pled guilty for planning violence.
But yeah- Epps.
I almost feel sorry for the dude but he was a Trump loyalist. This is what you get sadly.
Yes…precisely.
Called into question because Epps denies it.
And there’s no evidence for it.
That’s what called into question means.
Literally.
But you stay warm and cozy in your bubble.
Lol then just about every accusation that has ever been leveled at someone has been “called into question”.
1 Like
Well yes but some accusations have been proven others have not
Right now all you have is innuendo effected by predispositions. “It looks bad”. Now where have we heard this before. Recently too?
Oh yes bring on the mules!
1 Like
No…only those where the denial of the accusation is coupled with lack of evidence for the accusation in the first place.
There is zero evidence for Epps being involved in a nefarious conspiracy.
Again…so easily triggered…so easily led.
(But…but…you believe Trump colluded with Russia!…in 3…2…1…)
Except I dumped the mules when they failed to offer evidence. But we have this guy on camera inciting insurrection and no charges, puff piece in the Times, the go to government mouthpiece of record, fishy fishy, smells like three day old carp.
1 Like
Had there been any evidence to the positive that Epps is a Fed?
Anything other than it smells fishy or in the just asking questions phase?
Prosecutorial discretion as evidence of him being a fed. I get it.
These peeps can only be failed
The point is never the evidence or comprehensive investigation, just the creation of a general appearance of possible fishiness itself.
See:
Trump, Zelensky, Ukraine, Biden: The point was the public announcement, not the investigation.
Trump, DOJ, election fraud: Just say it’s corrupt.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
3 Likes
“I’m just asking questions”.
The conspiratorist’s favorite phrase when caught using the hypothesis to be tested as the null hypothesis.
