Texas must not let up on prosecuting foreign nationals who engage in criminal trespass

In view of the fact the Biden Administration is intent on filling Texas and the United States with millions upon millions of other countries poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, and criminal populations, and a traitorous judge has struck down the Title 42 policy [SOURCE] which allowed border agents to “rapidly expel migrants without letting them seek asylum” ___ which most certainly will encourage millions upon millions more of foreign nationals to flood across the Texas border ___ Texas must exercise its original authority to prohibit unwanted foreign nationals from invading the State of Texas, which also includes prosecuting them for criminal trespass if they do not heed a warning at the Texas border that their entrance is forbidden and they must immediately cross back over the border.

JWK

There is no “humanitarian crisis” at our southern border as reported on Fox News. It is an outright invasion of the United States, intentionally orchestrated and perpetuated by the leadership of our tyrannical federal government which includes traitorous, judges, legislators, and our current president of the United States.

A state does not have the power to prosecute people for “criminal trespass” for entering the state.

Trespass is a property crime. The state of Texas is not the property of the State of Texas.

1 Like

Thank you for your sophomoric opinion.

The state of Texas certainly has the authority to prosecute those who engage in “criminal trespass”.

Texas also has the original authority to prohibit unwanted foreign nationals from invading the State of Texas.

JWK

There is no “humanitarian crisis” at our southern border as reported on Fox News. It is an outright invasion of the United States, intentionally orchestrated and perpetuated by the leadership of our tyrannical federal government which includes traitorous, judges, legislators, and our current president of the United States.

Trespass where?

I believe there is a way to do it. The state prosecutes all crimes.

Where the trespasser is not welcome.

Public property?

Both public and private.

Sure. But what you describe isn’t “criminal trespass.”

A way to do what?

Then no.

Come on man!

Why not?

Trespass publicly accessible property? How?

:rofl:

I have no idea what nonsense legal theories you’re imagining.

Either make your point, or don’t.

You’re participating in the conversation yet can’t keep up?

1 Like

When it is known entry is not welcome.

I’d have thought you would have learned by now.

Not public property. Especially not in Texas.

Huh? I have no idea what you mean?