Yes. Derp derp.
Tax cuts that increase people’s tax liabilities. If that doesn’t epitomize the cluster ■■■■ that is the GOP policies and the dumbasses that support them, I don’t know what does.
It didn’t increase my tax liability.
Yes and no. The Republicans crafted legislation that specifically hurt states that did not vote for them in 2016. Trump fully supported this legislation.
So it’s Trump and the Republicans fault. It’s the reason New Jersey went 12-1 for Democrats after being 8-5 for Democrats.
Enacted policies have consequences
“Conservatives” aren’t concerned about deficits because they never cared about them. It’s just a boogie man to rally the base until the next tax cut for their donors.
I thought I was a conservative because until I realized this truth.
Well, it depends on how you define “conservatives.” If you’re talking about the Trump following “conservative” wannabes, no - they never cared about the debt. Actual conservatives that have rejected the GOP’s move left with the Trump nomination, however, are a different story.
Conservatives have no principles. Principles are something you have when your party goes in a bad direction. Like cutting taxes without cutting spending. The two should be tied together.
Did any conservatives scream about them cutting taxes and loading on the debt? No, they all voted happily for it. Bunch of two faced hypocrites.
there’s also this. has krugman ever been right?
Paul Krugman predicts a global recession after Trump's win | SBS News
Um…what does this have with Krugman pointing out Trump is potentially extorting businesses to support him so they can get a tariff break?
The story you posted is a prediction…economists get those wrong far more often than they get them right.
The story we’re talking about is Krugman talking about something Trump is actually doing.
This definitely appears to be an attempt at poisoning the well.
thinkingman:there’s also this. has krugman ever been right?
Paul Krugman predicts a global recession after Trump's win | SBS News
Um…what does this have with Krugman pointing out Trump is potentially extorting businesses to support him so they can get a tariff break?
The story you posted is a prediction…economists get those wrong far more often than they get them right.
The story we’re talking about is Krugman talking about something Trump is actually doing.
This definitely appears to be an attempt at poisoning the well.
krugman’s wrong all time and is a pure partisan political nitwit
JayJay: thinkingman:there’s also this. has krugman ever been right?
Paul Krugman predicts a global recession after Trump's win | SBS News
Um…what does this have with Krugman pointing out Trump is potentially extorting businesses to support him so they can get a tariff break?
The story you posted is a prediction…economists get those wrong far more often than they get them right.
The story we’re talking about is Krugman talking about something Trump is actually doing.
This definitely appears to be an attempt at poisoning the well.
krugman’s wrong all time and is a pure partisan political nitwit
Didn’t answer my question.
thinkingman: JayJay: thinkingman:there’s also this. has krugman ever been right?
Paul Krugman predicts a global recession after Trump's win | SBS News
Um…what does this have with Krugman pointing out Trump is potentially extorting businesses to support him so they can get a tariff break?
The story you posted is a prediction…economists get those wrong far more often than they get them right.
The story we’re talking about is Krugman talking about something Trump is actually doing.
This definitely appears to be an attempt at poisoning the well.
krugman’s wrong all time and is a pure partisan political nitwit
Didn’t answer my question.
i think it does.
No- it actually does not.
Impugning the messenger is just that- impugning the messenger and nothing more.
No- it actually does not.
Impugning the messenger is just that- impugning the messenger and nothing more.
he has a record of politically motivated predictions that bombed. thats not good in his business (unless you hate trump i guess).
that’s why i brought him up in the first place
JayJay:No- it actually does not.
Impugning the messenger is just that- impugning the messenger and nothing more.
he has a record of politically motivated predictions that bombed. thats not good in his business (unless you hate trump i guess).
that’s why i brought him up in the first place
That’s irrelevant.
Even the most blatant partisan can say something that’s objectively true.
Yes and no. The Republicans crafted legislation that specifically hurt states that did not vote for them in 2016. Trump fully supported this legislation.
So it’s Trump and the Republicans fault. It’s the reason New Jersey went 12-1 for Democrats after being 8-5 for Democrats.
Enacted policies have consequences
No they didn’t. The rules are the same for every state. If you don’t like your taxes, talk to your state reps. You got a cut from the republicans.
Voting dem has consequences.
thinkingman: JayJay:No- it actually does not.
Impugning the messenger is just that- impugning the messenger and nothing more.
he has a record of politically motivated predictions that bombed. thats not good in his business (unless you hate trump i guess).
that’s why i brought him up in the first place
That’s irrelevant.
Even the most blatant partisan can say something that’s objectively true.
not irrelevant when it’s so often, and so blatantly obviously political
but idiot news and media love that. so he still has a job
Conservatives have no principles. Principles are something you have when your party goes in a bad direction. Like cutting taxes without cutting spending. The two should be tied together.
Did any conservatives scream about them cutting taxes and loading on the debt? No, they all voted happily for it. Bunch of two faced hypocrites.
What spending did the dems scream about cutting?
Both have consequences. Republicans have lost my vote for a long time.
This CRAP again?!?
If you cut taxes, you are responsible for cutting spending or you are responsible for the increase in debt
Here’s the opposite side of the coin: If you propose new spending, you must find a way to pay for it.
I’m not picking on the Republicans for cutting taxes.
Both have consequences. Republicans have lost my vote for a long time.
because you vote on emotion instead of your own best interest.
Here’s the opposite side of the coin: If you propose new spending, you must find a way to pay for it.
I’m not picking on the Republicans for cutting taxes.
Tell it to the dems, I’m not proposing any new spending.