I never made that comparison. Try paying attention.
JWK
American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded Americaās borders.
You are a very confused person. Iām not interested in your comparison. I am interested in what the Democrat Party Leadership is planning to do if they get power.
JWK
The unavoidable truth is, Andrew Gillum and the Democrat Leadershipās socialist plan for āfreeā college tuition will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs
Iām trying to understand why that power grab bothers you, but not the power grab republicans were planning if Hillary won-preventing her nominees from having hearings or votes.
Why does one bother you and not the other?
I mean, WHY youāre refusing to answer is very obvious. We donāt even need you to explain.
Iām talking about political power grabs. Your OP was about a suggested Demo power grab that upset you. Why does that planned power grab bother you, but not the planned power grab from repubs if Hillary were to win?
Look at the last SC vote. Its pretty obvious that Democrats have exactly the same power plan that Republicans had. If they had a majority the results would have been exactly the sameā¦no Supreme Court Justices until we have a Democrat for President.
You seriously think that Democrats, if they take the Senate, will allow another conservative SC Justice? No way. The days of Alito and Kegan are over.
The last SC VOTE-yes, VOTE. Garland didnāt get a vote. Conservatives like Cruz wanted to BLOCK Hillary nominees from being seated, period. Big difference.
Voting them down is not the same as blocking and leaving a seat vacant because youāre mad the opposing party won.
My speculation is irrelevant. I can only state what Cruz SAID he would do were Hillary to win-block any of her nominees and leave the seat vacant.
You try all the tit for tat you want, but the point is that conservatives were floating the idea of leaving the court at 8 seats as a power grab before Democrats floated the idea of expanding it-lawfully.
Well, goody for you. Iām discussing a desire by democrats to expand then number of Supreme Court Justices if they seize political power. Try paying attention.
JWK
Let us not forget it was Nancy Pelosi whoSAID about Obamacare: āWe have to pass the Bill so that you can find out what is in itāVoting democratic will make her Speaker of the House
Yes, a political power grab, just like I said. Thatās exactly what you just described. So why are upset that Democrats want to do a power grab but not Republicans who wanted to do one?
They floated the idea of a political power grab-keeping the courts at 8 to prevent a liberal from getting another seat on the court.
Thatās a political power grab, just like adding seats in order to give a majority would be a power grab. Both sides have floated the idea of a power grab. Why are you OK with one and not the other?
The subject is political power grabs. Youāre OK with one side doing so, but not the other. There would be more integrity in you just admitting that.
Because when the GOP packs the Supreme Court, itās for the betterment of our Great Nation and Individual Freedoms.
When Social Democrat Leaders do it, itās to kill babies, implement communism, open our borders, and distribute free cheese to Fifth Column advocates who spit on the Constitution.