Social Democrat Leaders plan to pack the SC if they take over Congress

.

It is no longer a secret that socialist political leaders have a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court if they seize political power, and they will then appoint socialist Justices who will impose “social justice” as the rule of law rather than support and adhere to our written Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text.

See: These Leftists Want Democrats To Pack The Supreme Court Once Trump Is Gone

”Leftists upset that President Donald Trump will get to shape the Supreme Court in a conservative direction are increasingly embracing a radical plan to expand the number of seats on the court once Democrats retake Congress and the White House.”

Make no mistake, this desire __ making our Supreme Court into a Legislative body unaccountable to the people ___ began back in the early 1930s when Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a socialist democrat, attempted to pack the court under “The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937”. See Roosevelt announces “court-packing”plan

"On February 5, 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt announces a controversial plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges, allegedly to make it more efficient. Critics immediately charged that Roosevelt was trying to “pack” the court and thus neutralize Supreme Court justices hostile to his New Deal.

During the previous two years, the high court had struck down several key pieces of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority to the executive branch and the federal government."

And this is what the Democrat Party Leadership is about ___ subjugating our constitutionally limited system of government and creating an iron fisted socialist democracy where the mob rules, and fundamental rights and guarantees are ignored, including rights associated with property ownership.

Of course, this plan requires an overwhelming number of Justices on the Supreme Court who will ignore the true meaning of our Constitution, and give an illusion that social justice legislation adopted by a socialist political leadership in Congress, is within the meaning of our Constitution, and does not defy the text or legislative intent of our Constitution. Keep in mind this is exactly what happened when FDR’s Social Security Act was wrongly upheld by the court in 1935 which lied about the constitutional meaning of “general welfare” as the phrase appears in our Constitution.

The bottom line is, if social democrat leaders take control of the House and Senate this November, they will be well on their way to getting rid of President Trump, increasing the number of Justices on the Supreme Court, and then appointing a majority of Justices who will uphold social justice legislation, such as free Medicaid for all, designed to alter our system of government into an iron fisted socialist/communist state, just as is Cuba or Venezuela.

JWK

The unavoidable truth is, Andrew Gillum and the Democrat Leadership’s socialist plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs

1 Like

Fear.

It works.

5 Likes

Fear is the path to the darkside. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.

  • Yoda Circa 30 years BBY4

LOL!
There truly are a bunch of shook ones on this board.

FTR…fear is an ungodly trait.

1 Like

Fear speculation based on a article in a right-wing publication. Let me know when it actually becomes fact.

Here is a list of drugs that can help treat paranoia.

https://www.drugs.com/condition/paranoid-disorder.html

Is Slate a "right-wing publication?

See: Is It Time for Democrats to Fight Dirty?

”A new book argues Democrats should take on radical strategies to cement power.

April 12, 2018

"David Faris argues that Democrats have no choice but to pursue strategies aimed at tilting the balance of power perhaps permanently in their favor. The ideas he advances go far beyond age-old proposals like eliminating the Electoral College. Faris would have the next Democratic Congress and president, for instance, create several new Democratic-leaning states and pack the Supreme Court with new seats for liberal justices. Last week, I spoke with him about his strategic agenda. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.”

Look, the Democrat Leadership under FDR already tried to do this [pack the Supreme Court]. Why do you ignore historical facts?

JWK

The Democrat Leaders promise for free cheese doesn’t work in Cuba, doesn’t work in Venezuela ___ it only works for corrupted politicians who confiscate and then redistribute “free cheese” in order to buy votes and remain in power.

What about these right wingers?

from What does packing the Supreme Court mean? The Democrats’ nuclear option, explained - Vox

Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained

Why an FDR plan from the 1930s is suddenly popular again.

And these?

from https://www.washingtonpost.com/

Democrats must consider court-packing when they regain power. It’s the only way to save democracy.

I am not ignoring history. I am saying that these articles are only speculation. History does not always repeat itself.

Yes…The old FDR plan… Stack the courts. That alone, should have made him worthy of impeachment. But it was an era of strong men stemming from Marx and Nietzsche’s philosophy…

We all know the left would build Venezuela in an instant, if they could get the power. It’s their history. Many on the left still defend Stalin and Mao.

Like I have said before, I look forward to the day when you say one correct thing about us on the left.
No, many of us do not defend Stalin and Mao. And if those on the left wanted to build Venezuela it would have been done when our side controlled Congress and the WH. But hey, keep that fear-mongering at full volume. It makes you look so smart.

1 Like

If the left would makes it position clear perhaps there would be less mistakes about them. Notice you don’t even say what they stand for.

Right now SF wants to raise taxes to fix the homeless problem. See how they can’t learn. They do the same thing over and over and only get more homeless. They have no idea how to build a wealthy society.

Trumpflakes are some of the most timid of flakes

Trumpflakes have another thing going for them. Victory. How’s that resistance going for ya? :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

Hey, hey, ho, ho
brain dead chants have got to go.

2 Likes

Non-starter.

No way will there be anymore than 9 justices.

sorry just wishful thinking,

Better to get a dem elected in 2020 and get a dem senate for 2020 and then we are cooking with wesson oil for Clarence Thomas retirement,

Allan

Many winners are ■■■■■■■

Sounds good, but while we’re waiting on that Trump can replace RBG with a nice reasonable conservative…whatever voodoo zombie magic that’s keeping her animate can’t last that much longer.

What we do know is, the Democrat Party Leadership wants to raid the Medicare Trust Fund and use it to provide “free” Medicaid for all, including illegal entrants and their children … welcome to a Cuban style health-care system for all.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership’s offer for free government cheese is really not free. It first addicts and then enslaves participants on an iron fisted socialist run plantation.

Thomas is the next one for sure, old birds like Ginsberg are a tough out.

Allan

I say we preempt them and add another 8 to SCOTUS for total of 17.

What says you?

1 Like