A mind generating the simulation and actors within it certainly does explode any possibility of “mindless evolution.”
Talk about unreasoning delusion, you can’t even entertain a competing thought.
A mind generating the simulation and actors within it certainly does explode any possibility of “mindless evolution.”
Talk about unreasoning delusion, you can’t even entertain a competing thought.
So it is alleged. by old racist tainted research. However, newer research free of said racism disputes that claim:
Spectacular fossil finds made in China, along with an ambitious research programme and soon to be complemented by studies of ancient genomes, are raising the profile of Chinese palaeoanthropology. New findings are likely to add complexity to the...
Drawz: BornAgainChristian:The point being, Africa was chosen because they assumed blacks were “less evolved.”
No, Africa was, “chosen” because that’s were the evidence of the oldest human and pre-human remains have been found. You’re out of your depth.
So it is alleged. by old racist tainted research. However, newer research free of said racism disputes that claim:
It’s a very exciting possibility, but racism is not the reason that we’ve found the oldest humans and pre-humans in Africa.
BornAgainChristian: Bomberfox:That will not happen, pigs come from a different branch than humans. Try again.
This will blow your mind:
And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. (Col. 1:17 NKJ)
For in him we live, and move, and have our being (Acts 17:28 KJV)
Irrelevant but you still insert god into the gaps in our knowledge.
If everything is holographic, the Mind generating the hologram isn’t irrelevant. The premise of “mindless evolutionary change” is absurd.
BornAgainChristian: Drawz: BornAgainChristian:The point being, Africa was chosen because they assumed blacks were “less evolved.”
No, Africa was, “chosen” because that’s were the evidence of the oldest human and pre-human remains have been found. You’re out of your depth.
So it is alleged. by old racist tainted research. However, newer research free of said racism disputes that claim:
It’s a very exciting possibility, but racism is not the reason that we’ve found the oldest humans and pre-humans in Africa.
Tch Tch, didn’t click the link:
CURRENT BIOLOGY
A new continent for human evolution
Spectacular fossil finds made in China, along with an ambitious research programme and soon to be complemented by studies of ancient genomes, are raising the profile of Chinese palaeoanthropology. New findings are likely to add complexity to the established ‘out of Africa’ model describing the emergence of our species and its spread around the world. Michael Gross reports.
Spectacular fossil finds made in China, along with an ambitious research programme and soon to be complemented by studies of ancient genomes, are raising the profile of Chinese palaeoanthropology. New findings are likely to add complexity to the...
Yep. And DNA mutates, so all of those millions of years necessitate evolution…im sure some species that lived millions of years ago could survive today. But millions of years of mutation will make you go away, “inferior or not”
Drawz: BornAgainChristian: Drawz: BornAgainChristian:The point being, Africa was chosen because they assumed blacks were “less evolved.”
No, Africa was, “chosen” because that’s were the evidence of the oldest human and pre-human remains have been found. You’re out of your depth.
So it is alleged. by old racist tainted research. However, newer research free of said racism disputes that claim:
It’s a very exciting possibility, but racism is not the reason that we’ve found the oldest humans and pre-humans in Africa.
Tch Tch, didn’t click the link:
CURRENT BIOLOGY
A new continent for human evolution
Spectacular fossil finds made in China, along with an ambitious research programme and soon to be complemented by studies of ancient genomes, are raising the profile of Chinese palaeoanthropology. New findings are likely to add complexity to the established ‘out of Africa’ model describing the emergence of our species and its spread around the world. Michael Gross reports.
I did, I also read more than the summary. Did you?
Yes and I understand evolution better than you. You don’t even know the basic premise of evolution
Lib arrogance is so funny
Ya like wild rose doesn’t exemplify arrogance hahaha get a room you two!
BornAgainChristian: Drawz: BornAgainChristian: Drawz: BornAgainChristian:The point being, Africa was chosen because they assumed blacks were “less evolved.”
No, Africa was, “chosen” because that’s were the evidence of the oldest human and pre-human remains have been found. You’re out of your depth.
So it is alleged. by old racist tainted research. However, newer research free of said racism disputes that claim:
It’s a very exciting possibility, but racism is not the reason that we’ve found the oldest humans and pre-humans in Africa.
Tch Tch, didn’t click the link:
CURRENT BIOLOGY
A new continent for human evolution
Spectacular fossil finds made in China, along with an ambitious research programme and soon to be complemented by studies of ancient genomes, are raising the profile of Chinese palaeoanthropology. New findings are likely to add complexity to the established ‘out of Africa’ model describing the emergence of our species and its spread around the world. Michael Gross reports.
I did, I also read more than the summary. Did you?
Good. No, the summary said everything I needed.
Good. No, the summary said everything I needed.
Remarkable. Two sentences that vaguely describe the research you’re citing is all you need.
BornAgainChristian:Good. No, the summary said everything I needed.
Remarkable. Two sentences that vaguely describe the research you’re citing is all you need.
So you know, the research doesn’t bear out what you’re claiming.
BornAgainChristian: Drawz: BornAgainChristian: Drawz: BornAgainChristian:The point being, Africa was chosen because they assumed blacks were “less evolved.”
No, Africa was, “chosen” because that’s were the evidence of the oldest human and pre-human remains have been found. You’re out of your depth.
So it is alleged. by old racist tainted research. However, newer research free of said racism disputes that claim:
It’s a very exciting possibility, but racism is not the reason that we’ve found the oldest humans and pre-humans in Africa.
Tch Tch, didn’t click the link:
CURRENT BIOLOGY
A new continent for human evolution
Spectacular fossil finds made in China, along with an ambitious research programme and soon to be complemented by studies of ancient genomes, are raising the profile of Chinese palaeoanthropology. New findings are likely to add complexity to the established ‘out of Africa’ model describing the emergence of our species and its spread around the world. Michael Gross reports.
I did, I also read more than the summary. Did you?
And it is elementary why racism would explain why “the oldest humans and prehumans” were found in Africa.
That is an assumption, not proved facts. The actual dates are theoretical, based on assumptions that are unknowable. And it follows digs occur where people the best data can be found. So a racist assumption will affect where one looks. If almost everyone is looking in Africa, its no wonder more is found there than in China.
Drawz: BornAgainChristian:Good. No, the summary said everything I needed.
Remarkable. Two sentences that vaguely describe the research you’re citing is all you need.
So you know, the research doesn’t bear out what you’re claiming.
No, I gleaned from the summary disputes exist consistent with the China origins hypothesis. Its not pertinent the author (or most) don’t agree, those raising the issue clear do and they are on the cusp of new discoveries that ARE shaking up the old paradigm.
But recall, I say the theory of Evolution is a Mass Delusion, which confirmation bias will sustain for a long long time.
Until the Extraterrestrials land claiming to be “the Designers.” THAT all you secularists will run to accept, discarding evolution entirely.
Put ET as “the Elohim” Creators, and Creationism becomes “the truth.” Put God as the Creator, and heaven and earth is moved to deny the obvious.
Only intelligence will create intelligently designed life.
Who designed god?
Who designed god?
Neither Betrand Russell or Philip Dawkins saw the fallacy of their “who made God” argument, because their perspective is finite. They couldn’t “see” outside of their finite box.
Within the infinite, everything has a beginning. But God is infinite, therefore can have no beginning:
In Him all things consist. (Col. 1:17 NKJ)
But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded? (1 Ki. 8:27 KJV)
In other words, its impossible something “greater than infinite” exist.
Neither Betrand Russell or Philip Dawkins saw the fallacy of their “who made God” argument, because their perspective is finite. They couldn’t “see” outside of their finite box.
Within the infinite, everything has a beginning. But God is infinite, therefore can have no beginning:
In Him all things consist. (Col. 1:17 NKJ)
But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded? (1 Ki. 8:27 KJV)
In other words, its impossible something “greater than infinite” exist.
And you know this because?
JayJay:The Simulation Hypothesis in no ways goes against the Theiry of Evolution nor does it support a Christian conception of a creator.
Indeed the Simulation Hypothesis is a naturalistic hypothesis because it assumes beings like us living in an actual universe, as they become capable enough, being able to simulate their own universe so as to understand it better.
Any other half-understood ideas you’d likemto throw out there to pretend you know what you’re talking about?
Didn’t mean I agree with their take on the holographic principle, just the idea of the Matrix itself.
Its consistent with the scripture cited.
Which should terrify you secularists. Our matrix generated in the infinite Mind of God, which permits you free will. But also renders any possibility one can escape His Justice, absurd. Look at the reaction of these when they realize it is a matrix, and the very sky is rolled up like a scroll:
14 Then the sky receded as a scroll when it is rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved out of its place.
15 And the kings of the earth, the great men, the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave and every free man, hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains,
16 and said to the mountains and rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of Him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb!
17 “For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?” (Rev. 6:14-7:1 NKJ)Only repentance and public confession of belief in the name of the LORD Jesus Christ, permits you watch this spectacle safely from the vantage point of heaven.
Secularism is different from atheism, theists can be secular when it comes to governments. I am not terrified because that simulation thing is a hypothesis and it has yet to be demonstrated that we live in the mind of a god.
mobulis:Who designed god?
Neither Betrand Russell or Philip Dawkins saw the fallacy of their “who made God” argument, because their perspective is finite. They couldn’t “see” outside of their finite box.
Within the infinite, everything has a beginning. But God is infinite, therefore can have no beginning:
In Him all things consist. (Col. 1:17 NKJ)
But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded? (1 Ki. 8:27 KJV)
In other words, its impossible something “greater than infinite” exist.
They are following the theist infinite regress to its logical conclusion and taking out the special pleading.
mobulis:Who designed god?
Neither Betrand Russell or Philip Dawkins saw the fallacy of their “who made God” argument, because their perspective is finite. They couldn’t “see” outside of their finite box.
Within the infinite, everything has a beginning. But God is infinite, therefore can have no beginning:
In Him all things consist. (Col. 1:17 NKJ)
But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded? (1 Ki. 8:27 KJV)
In other words, its impossible something “greater than infinite” exist.
Mankind created gods. We have a tendency to anthropomorphize things because we have an innate agency detection. We looked at the world in a way that made sense according to our understanding at the time. It was assumed that since people create all sorts of things, then that must mean everything must be created. However, we have not observed planets, solar systems, and life being created by a god, certainly not out of an ancient hebrew golem spell.