Since Lying to Congress is so Egregious

[Smyrna]

@JayJay

You obviously don’t work for nor ever worked for a large organization.

This is standard prep.

This isn’t a large organization. Those that testified work for you…and I and all I want is…the truth, the whole truth…and nothing but…the truth.

[JayJay]

@Smyrna

@JayJay

You obviously don’t work for nor ever worked for a large organization.

This is standard prep.

This isn’t a large organization. Those that testified work for you…and I and all I want is…the truth, the whole truth…and nothing but…the truth.

The federal government isn’t a large organization?

News to me…

[WuWei]

She “misspoke”

[Paul_Thomson]

@NuffSaid

You said she might be under investigation. There was no mention that she could be.

There was mention of shoddy book-keeping tracking billions of dollars given to Ukraine. Would the US ambassador to Ukraine have any responsibility for the disbursement of those funds?

[NuffSaid]

@Paul_Thomson

@NuffSaid

You said she might be under investigation. There was no mention that she could be.

There was mention of shoddy book-keeping tracking billions of dollars given to Ukraine. Would the US ambassador to Ukraine have any responsibility for the disbursement of those funds?

So you have no evidence she may be under investigation. Good to know, thanks!

[Paul_Thomson]

@NuffSaid

So you have no evidence she may be under investigation. Good to know, thanks!

I guess you don’t understand the use of the subjunctive in English.

[westaussie]

What about the lies D Trump tells each day?

[WuWei]

@westaussie

What about

[WuWei]

She lied, testimony died.

[LeroyBrown]

@WuWei

She “misspoke”

She lied. If the statement is a material statement then she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent as prescribed by United States Code, title 18, section 1001… or maybe its 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591. To be honest, I haven’t read every sections of the code.

This involves impeachment. If people are going to intentionally bring false testimony, they better pay the price for it.

[kingarthur65]

@LeroyBrown

@WuWei

She “misspoke”

She lied. If the statement is a material statement then she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent as prescribed by United States Code, title 18, section 1001… or maybe its 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591. To be honest, I haven’t read every sections of the code.

This involves impeachment. If people are going to intentionally bring false testimony, they better pay the price for it.

Her statement was later corrected by her testimony

[WuWei]

@kingarthur65

@LeroyBrown

@WuWei

She “misspoke”

She lied. If the statement is a material statement then she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent as prescribed by United States Code, title 18, section 1001… or maybe its 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591. To be honest, I haven’t read every sections of the code.

This involves impeachment. If people are going to intentionally bring false testimony, they better pay the price for it.

Her statement was later corrected by her testimony

[markdido]

@westaussie

What about the lies D Trump tells each day?

How about trying to stick to the thread topic and stop deflecting?

Jesus, talk about whataboutism, you literally used that term in your post.

[RTchoke]

@kingarthur65

@LeroyBrown

@WuWei

She “misspoke”

She lied. If the statement is a material statement then she should be prosecuted to the fullest extent as prescribed by United States Code, title 18, section 1001… or maybe its 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591. To be honest, I haven’t read every sections of the code.

This involves impeachment. If people are going to intentionally bring false testimony, they better pay the price for it.

Her statement was later corrected by her testimony

I got nothing for this bull squeeze but

[LeroyBrown]

@kingarthur65

Her statement was later corrected by her testimony

If her statement did not contain the phrase “I am sorry, my opening statement was incorrect” and then the correction, the term you are looking for is contradicted.