By dropping standardized test score requirements are not the schools themselves likely anticipating what the SCOTUS is going to do, and as such finding a different way to continue with their agenda for racial equity over student efficacy?
It’s not unusual in wartime. US Army standards dropped dramatically during WWII, Korea, and the later part of Vietnam.
But it is weird to see this have to be done during peacetime. That’s honestly scary. As a society, we simply aren’t really prepared to fight another extended war. Especially if it’s against a near peer enemy like China.
What worries me is that they are dropping the standards so dramatically during peacetime.
In an active big war, standards are dropped out of necessity. Because you need more men (and women) to fill every role.
But this is peacetime. Of course there are small operations going on all over the world but nothing the size of Iraq 2 or Afghanistan.
Historically, this means that the standards for enlistment would be raised dramatically.
But considering that every branch is bleeding long timers like crazy (the articles are genuinely terrifying; all of that NCO combat experience the US Army and Marine Corps had thanks to Iraq 2 and Afghanistan is basically gone now) combined with extremely low enlistment… this is becoming a disaster.
They’ll basically have to rebuild the branches from scratch.
But if the military keeps going down the path it is on and enlistment’s continue to drop, the ugly specter of conscription is eventually going to raise its head out of absolute necessity.
Where the push is happening, it’s actually because little if any correlation between standardized test results and educational achievement actually exists.
If a metric is useless for predicting future performance…why keep it?
You know what the biggest driving factor towards high SAT scores is?
Money.
If your parents can provide extensive SAT training courses, you’ll probably do well on SATs.
But that doesn’t mean you’ve actually learned anything or have a propensity for high achievement.
I’m extremely anti-conscription but I agree. I just don’t see how we avoid it in the next ten years or so.
They’ve got to figure something out. Some kind of way to attract young Gen Z and the generation right after them.
Getting back to the focus being on the mission first and foremost might help some. No more of the social experimenting. That’s part of the reason so many long timers ended their enlistments early instead of doing their 20 years. That’s a ton of lost practical combat experience that could have been passed on to the next generation of soldiers.
Equity demands that since only straight cis-males have been drafted in the past, any draft now should target women and LGBTQ. That would be affirmative action.
My unsupported suspicion of why graduates from the big Ivy League schools do so,well statistically is because their parents wealth and position that got them into those schools also got them their position in that big firm or corporation when they graduated.