With a good criminal lawyer this is going to be a great court case. He’s not getting off completely but the charges of premeditated murder are going to be vigorously argued considering video evidence showing he was assaulted by two individuals.
Your idiosyncratic verbs and adjectives are another thing I missed while you were gone.
1 Like
Defund the police is a terrible slogan and on that doesn’t accurate reflect the desire of the protesters.
But you continue to struggle with reading comprehension, but glad you recognize it.
I have posted the law many times. Self defense is a affirmative defense.
To claim it you have to prove that not only were you in danger and had no other recourse, but if you were commiting a illegal act (like being underage and carrying a loaded weapon) you have to prove that your actions were not what provoked the danger.
You keep giving senerios where unrelated to the illegal weapon, the person life was in danger.
This kids was only at risk if bodily harm BECAUSE he had the weapon and went to the middle of the unrest.
Saying “Antifa” got shot is the same as me saying “A White supremacists did the shooting”.
Zero evidence and prob not the case.
Zero chance the kid is cleared of all charges.
100% false because he is charged with murder as a adult thet can’t discuss that he was a minor with a weapon.
Also, don’t forget that the state doesn’t have to prove his life wasn’t in danger, he had to prove that his life was in danger and not because he provoked anyone by, say, waving a loaded gun at them in the middle of a protestors.
If your position was that protestors were threatening and harming others with guns there please show me those cases.
Otherwise it’s seems only this kid felt he was in danger and he didn’t provoke them by having a gun there. Will be hard to prove since the only ones shot that night was the ones he shot.
Seriously!? This is self-contradictory.
The immediate cause of his shooting people was his being attacked by those two people. The big remaining question is if the initial shot to the person in the arm was a random shot by him or if that happened because the person who was shot was attacking him. If it was a shot because he was being assaulted then the series of events was 1. he shoots someone in the arm in self defense 2. he is chased by their fellow mob members who attack him violently 3. he shoots them in self defense.
If he shot the first guy randomly, then the two who were shot were trying to subdue a random terrorist.
Big differences.
Let the jury look at the facts.
I actually agree with this.
But still want to point out, the burden of prove is going to be on the kid to prove that the 1st guy he shot was 100% self defense and he had no other option AND didn’t provoke the 1st person
That is gonna be a tough hill to climb.
Hard to argue his life wasn’t in danger when a brick being thrown at him is on camera.
Rioters and arsonists are not protestors.
Being shot is t the criteria for self defense. Fear of grave bodily harm is. Bricks being thrown…check. Hit in the head by a skateboard…check. Kicked in the head by a guy with a gun…check.
2 Likes
Found this on some criminal law firm website. Its sort of vague, but so is the effect of it on the case if the kid did not have a legal right to carry a gun.
“Depending on the circumstances and the law in your state, the fact that you possessed, carried, or used a gun illegally may not prevent you from defending yourself against criminal charges by claiming that you needed it for self-defense. Even if you’re allowed to use that defense, illegal gun possession could cast you in a suspicious light with law enforcement or complicate an already potentially complicated case if you have to use the weapon in self-defense.”
Blake’s parents speak out against rioting in his name.
The 17 yr old is an idiot for being there, but the real blame, lies with the Wisconsin, leftists, BLM/Antifa and their funders.
Had police been there in force, none of this insanity would have happened.
Time to throw out these corrupted politicians, and mass media playing politics, the entire Democrat party and some of the Republicans are guilty as sin.
Our DOJ is also to blame, still allowing these Mad Men like Soros, to run free and fund these scummy nutjobs.
3 Likes
I’ve heard he tried to turn himself in on the night and the police sent him home. Then the political actors called for his arrest the next day. The Nicholas Sandman effect.
1 Like
Turns out little Kyle committed a Misdemeanor offense by possessing that firearm while the others were committing felonies against a minor.
2 Likes
https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1298669264568586240?s=20
Look at this jerk. He came to hunt humans.
you just posted a tweet from Shannon Watts! 
The murder charges won’t stick. The penalty for felony assault will certainly stick for the other three.
The Nicholas Sandman effect…but with people killed instead of charges of smirking.
I’m thinking possession of the gun and manslaughter. Maybe Class G.
Those whose property or life is directly affected by it would be my answer.
The possession is a misdemeanor. I don’t think he’ll get convicted of manslaughter either.
1 Like
