This is talking and handguns not rifles. The only thing a seventeen year can’t do is purchase a rifle or handgun. They can possess a rifle not a handgun.
False. The last paragraph is the only one that has to do with rifles and shotguns.
Paragraph 1 is very clear. Then they list the exceptions.
Tell me where, or find your own link, where there is a exception for those 17 that passed a hunter course
Also, to add. A different law defines “Dangerous weapon”
Sure doesn’t sound like it is applying only to handguns or rifles to me.
- “Dangerous weapon" means any firearm, whether loaded or unloaded; any device designed as a weapon and capable of producing death or great bodily harm; any ligature or other instrumentality used on the throat, neck, nose, or mouth of another person to impede, partially or completely, breathing or circulation of blood; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); or any other device or instrumentality which, in the manner it is used or intended to be used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm
Why not call him a thug? He had an illegal weapon and killed somebody. Guess he just from the right side of town.
3 Likes
A knife?
Sorry I’ll take the word of a man who lives and owns fire arms in WI. Texted him a while ago and he is the one saying that anyone over the age of 14 can possess a fire arm. They do not have to be going hunting or to the gun range.
The written law or “a dude I know in WI”
It’s close…
Your friend is wrong
1 Like
I couldn’t give a damn. I guessed that opportunity goodbye.
Most anti gun people don’t understand the nuance of the term.
Firearms are neither legal or illegal. they are tools. Possessing said firearms without the proper license however, is.
If he killed them in self-defense why did he flee the state.
*Co-counsel? Not fair to team up.
He went home.
2 Likes
according to the police he fled with the intent of hiding from the authorities.
but then again he walk right passed the police with the murder weapon.
My gut was right. It looked like self-defense in the video I saw, but I felt like I leaving things out of my evaluation.
Buuuut, supposing that he did provoke it, he was running away and therefore trying not to engage them any longer. How is this different than shooting at a fleeing thief, where Rittenhouse is the thief and the people throwing things at him are like the person who shoots the fleeing thief?
I thought he turned himself in.
Antifa and some BLM who also use intimidate which i had seen on a stream.
From the video or screenshots he was waiting for the police to be picked up or arrested but the police passed by him.
Either i have seen a screenshot of a rioter with a gun who was trying to shot him.
Why am I not surprised.
1 Like
About what?
