Just prior to passing the resolution, the Senate also overwhelming approved a resolution by a 56-41 vote that would require the US to end its military support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, a move aimed both at ending that war and expressing anger at the Trump administration’s handling of relations with Saudi Arabia.
No, they’re not turning. Some of them occasionally put on a borrowed spine for branding purposes. They’ll have it back to the Rent-a-Center before the term is due this afternoon.
After the landmark vote, the Senate by voice vote passed a nonbinding resolution from Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., that states Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, is responsible for the assassination of Khashoggi and criticizes numerous other actions by Riyadh as well as the
Houthi insurgents in Yemen and their Iranian backers.
“Senate rebukes Trump**, condemns Saudi crown prince for Khashoggi murder”
Later in the article we read:
“While the resolution condemning the crown prince, introduced by Republican Sen. Bob Corker, serves as an implicit rebuke of the President’s own response to the death of Khashoggi…”
Ok, the Senate knows how to pass a resolution saying explicitly that they Rebuke Trump. They did not do that. CNN said they did. CNN lied.
Do you see now why CNN is considered totally biased and a source of fake news?
So you say that they couldn’t have even rebuked Trump? Sure, they could pass a resolution rebuking Trump explicitly. I would buy a censure as close enough.
Rebuke: an expression of sharp disapproval or criticism. That’s what the senate did when they voted exactly opposite from how their president signaled them to vote; even McConnell.