According to Scott Adams, Democrats have learned from polling that virtually all their policies unpopular. The only exception is abortion, but that has become a state issue outside of the national debate. Instead of addressing policies, they are pushing more hoaxes as pretext to win at any cost.
The Adams prediction for the top three Democrat hoaxes for 2024 are:
Trump invokes Hitler / fine-people hoax part 2
Trump is a Putin pawn / Russia-collusion hoax part 2
January 6 was an “insurrection”
See video from 32:05 to 38:00
According to Adams, fake fact checkers funded by Democrats will support the hoaxes, which will be endlessly repeated in the mainstream media. Democrat judges will then use the hoaxes as justification to allow the weaponization of the government to rig the election and to prosecute political enemies under color of law.
If Adams is right, the recent Colorado ruling to remove Trump from the ballot based on the insurrection hoax is just the beginning.
Is the US headed towards a one-party police state?
Or are the warmed-over official narratives becoming so transparently false that they are simply destroying the credibility of the government and the media?
We note, however, that despite the use of the xenophobic and inflammatory phrase “poisoning the blood” by both Hitler and Trump, they may not have meant precisely the same thing by it. It appears that Hitler was fundamentally claiming that an influx of “foreign blood” (i.e., that of non-Aryan races) had “poisoned the blood” of the German race through miscegenation. Trump, on the other hand, judging from his statements in both the National Pulse interview and the 2016 debate, appears to have been claiming that immigrants bring dangerous drugs and diseases across the southern border, and it is those which are “poisoning the blood” of Americans. What, exactly, Trump did mean to say remains unclear and difficult to parse.
The Snopes link that I found punted on giving a true or false rating on the Trump-quotes-Hitler hoax that Adams mentioned. Instead Snopes just provided several pages of text, which is how they side-stepped debunking the fine-people hoax.
Actually it is just opposite. 99% of Snopes readers will never get beyond the headline and the first line or two, which plant the hoax without a false rating.
Adams said that the Democrats would trot out a rewarmed version of the fine-people hoax and that is exactly what they are doing.
Snopes would lose its donors if it rated it false. They would lose all credibility if they rated it true. No rating and several pages of text is the best they can do to obscure the truth.
I expect to see a Biden campaign ad based on the hoax falsely painting Trump as a Nazi supporter.
Meanwhile giving a standing ovation honoring the service of an actual Waffen SS soldier will get you tens of billions in military aid requests from President Biden. Clearly supporting actual Nazis is just fine in the right context.
