Science isn’t a person.
“The science show that Donald…” Pompous nonsense.
And “creating of obstacles in the voting process” is what the “science shows”?
precisely
there is ZERO science in that article
but because it’s Sci American (which no one here reads) it has to be right. lol
sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
Science isn’t a person.
Nor is the endorsement
SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
science doesnt choose political sides
see how bad youve been lied to
What a crock of crap. “because he rejects evidence and science. The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives”
This short clip exposes them to be total corrupt, hack frauds that are nothing but additional mouth pieces of the totally deranged Democrat party. When Biden loses, I’d love to see any government funding removed. I do not want to contribute in anyway to this unscientific mentality.
By saying that Trump’s response “cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives” means they are claiming that but for Trump’s response, there would have been no deaths from coronavirus in the US at all. What an absurd lie.
SixFoot: sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
Science isn’t a person.
Nor is the endorsement
Of course.
sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
science doesnt choose political sides
Which is why this sudden chamge.is so unprecedented
Not ‘no deaths’.
SixFoot: sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
Science isn’t a person.
Nor is the endorsement
what???
The people pushing faulty science sure do though.
sikofit: SixFoot: sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
Science isn’t a person.
Nor is the endorsement
what???
The endorsement is not from a person
Not ‘no deaths’.
what alternative number did they propose other than implied 0?
Science is human; it does not, nevertheless, have anything to do with recent American bothsidesism.
You assert the zero.
thinkingman: sikofit: SixFoot: sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
Science isn’t a person.
Nor is the endorsement
what???
The endorsement is not from a person
yeah that makes no sense
You assert the zero.
please answer the question
Science is human; it does not, nevertheless, have anything to do with recent American bothsidesism.
science is not human
You have stated the zero. You are dealing in an either/or I reject.
sikofit: thinkingman: sikofit: SixFoot: sikofit: SixFoot:A lib response to the police union endorsing the President.
Science is liberal?
Science isn’t a person.
Nor is the endorsement
what???
The endorsement is not from a person
yeah that makes no sense
That would involve thinking
Of course the scientific method is a human method.
Good ■■■■■■■ gods.