Scientific American POTUS endorsement

Science isn’t a person.

precisely

there is ZERO science in that article

but because it’s Sci American (which no one here reads) it has to be right. lol

Nor is the endorsement

science doesnt choose political sides

see how bad youve been lied to

1 Like

By saying that Trump’s response “cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives” means they are claiming that but for Trump’s response, there would have been no deaths from coronavirus in the US at all. What an absurd lie.

2 Likes

Of course.

Which is why this sudden chamge.is so unprecedented

Not ‘no deaths’.

what???

The people pushing faulty science sure do though. :wink:

The endorsement is not from a person

what alternative number did they propose other than implied 0?

Science is human; it does not, nevertheless, have anything to do with recent American bothsidesism.

You assert the zero.

yeah that makes no sense

please answer the question

science is not human

You have stated the zero. You are dealing in an either/or I reject.

That would involve thinking

Of course the scientific method is a human method.

Good ■■■■■■■ gods.