There are plenty of rape murders to go around.
Criminals who commit these crimesmust be dealt with harshly.
White, black, brown, yellow or green.
Allan
There are plenty of rape murders to go around.
Criminals who commit these crimesmust be dealt with harshly.
White, black, brown, yellow or green.
Allan
Why does this get posted in politics.
This crime had nothing to do with politics.
Allan
Big time politics of race division.
The incessant political cry of race is anti American and anti unity and unwelcome.
In the reports you posted there’s nothing emphasising the race of those involved? As a woke lib that’s all that matters to me.
What does a rape / murder have to do with politics.
Still no answer.
Allan
oh i know it’s enough to make your head explode.
good points about the motivation honestly but i dont care about that. it doesnt look random she was prob mixed up in some ugly stuff
what’s staggering is the lack of interest in media. they report on it then move on quickly
such obvious cowards
you dont know that. and theres no evidence of it
so all this is is your opinion
k thanks
…cuz it’s different…that’s why and racism is the name of a one way street.
Notice the watered down headlines; “allegedly” was used to describe the crime and not the word “murdered” or “hate crime”? Why is that? The answer is because it’s a sheople trough and they don’t want you regurgibleating such things as that cuz it works against the lib narrative…agreed?
Thank goodness…NO.
They targeted a white chick specifically
because
He targeted Asian businesses specifically.
but no not this time. lol
but no not this time. lol
There is absolutely, positively, no question about it…a double standard applied by the MSM describing crimes where the victims and perps are of different races. The MSM does everything is can to fan the flames of racial divide…in part…because it was disappearing and that removes their leverage.
I’ll agree that’s what’s happening with this story and this thread.
The op is talking about cnn and MSN c. Nice try moving the goalposts.
And the wall-to-wall coverage. Leading headlines. Top-story status.
This happens every time. Someone asks the question. Libs scour up counter-examples of internet links. But we all know (libs included) that just about every story can be found propagated in just about every news source library. And we all know (libs included) that such links alone are NOT the same as the level-of-coverage that is the actual point of the question.
We all know the difference. But libs dutifully play the game nonetheless. It’s predictable. It’s expected.
You could answer my question. Why do you think Fox News is reporting on this story?
It’s in their library of links like every other news source. But it’s not a leading story there either.
There is absolutely, positively, no question about it…a double standard applied by the MSM
And by libs in general.
If they are fair and balanced…then it is just since Trump left the White House and they were able to crawl out of his colon and are now desperately looking for another host to attach themselves too…
Being the parasites that they are…
If they are fair and balanced…then it is just since Trump left the White House and they were able to crawl out of his colon and are now desperately looking for another host to attach themselves too…
Being the parasites that they are…
Fox was the only outlet where Trump’s overall coverage nearly crept into positive territory—52 percent of Fox’s reports with a clear tone were negative, while 48 percent were positive.
A new report from Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzes news coverage of President Trump’s first 100 days in office. The report is based on an analysis of news reports in the print editions of The...
you dont know that. and theres no evidence of it
so all this is is your opinion
k thanks
I do know that. A pattern is an indicator. 3 Asian owned businesses. Not 1, not 2, but 3.
That’s a pattern.