I don’t understand what this post is trying to do.
An article is posted with the specific intention of showing that members of a particular race committed a crime. Is that meant to emphasize the negative actions of members of that race? Is it meant to excuse the actions of another race? Is it meant to show one race is better or worse? Is it meant to show all races have people who commit crimes?
If it’s the later and you think people don’t realize that, why do you feel it’s something to prove and why would you do so in such a crass way?
He killed 6 Asians and 2 non Asians. If race was his motivating factor he does a poor job.
But you can make your implication, and other can imply about the other case if they wish.
All Foxnews did was provide facts. Those similar facts were hidden by Yahoo News but, for the Atlanta killer, blasted all over the place.
Now, since the Duke Lacrosse case was mentioned…that was a one time incident (non)occurrence. Did you object that conclusions should not have been drawn as to racial motivations?
They were facts.
How was the race of the Atlanta perpetrator relevant?
How was the race of the falsely accused Duke Lacrosse team and the accuser relevant?