SATs go SJW - SATs will now contain secret 'adversity scores' 🚨🚨

Lol, gonna go ahead and call BS on this.

Openly revealing confidential student information is just cause for termination.

That is a question you have to determine the answer for yourself.

For me, this is an issue that has far broader tendrils than what is just on the surface.

There is a propensity for those on the left to want to create class warfare. If you are “disadvantaged” then let’s engineer advantage for you.

Except that is not the way reality works.

The person best suited for the job should be the person who receives that job regardless of their economic status or color of their skin.

The people wanting to enter academia should be accepted based on their scores, period. There should be competition to enter with the highest scores, not competition on who has the best sob story.

You cannot socially engineer fairness in life. That is what this ‘adversity score’ is attempting to do.

lol @ taking the SAT

Not sure why your opinion would need correcting, but the adversity scores are not race- or gender-based. Poor white guys will benefit too.

There are lots of qualified people who don’t get into all the colleges they apply to because the competition is fierce. This scoring system will give an edge to qualified students who weren’t born with one. I’m all for it.

Why are you people so dramatic? If a white kid with good grades/scores from Appalachia gets a few extra points, I’m all for it. Nobody in academia is accepted “based on their scores, period.” I can’t believe I have to say this.

To summarize:

Marginalize, attempt to normalize what isn’t normal, cast aspersions on anyone who isn’t on board with the program all while making yourself sound superior. :rofl:

opinion noted

In the 1980’s? Things were different back then. Like when one of our thirty something teachers married a senior girl two weeks after graduation and gave birth six months later (do the math) and no one batted an eye.

Right or wrong it was a different world.

We literally at graduation sat by by our class rank order. Granted I went to a small high school, my graduating class had 43 people in it, which maybe explains things.

Sounds like trump country.

Stupid idea.

So can anyone fill me in on the point of taking the SAT or ACT? Is that like for people who “can’t” afford college to get a scholarship or something?

It’s supposedly a test that determines potential fitness for college work. Most universities & colleges consider SAT/ACT—if I’m not mistaken, the latter exam includes more subjects than English & math—as well as difficulty of course work, grades, & extracurricular involvement as far as whether ir not they accept a potential student.

1 Like

:roll_eyes::roll_eyes::roll_eyes:

Of course there are outliers. But those are the outliers. The silver spoon kid never had to worry about going to be hungry. Never had to worry about how they were getting to school. Never had to worry about the gangs shooting up their house.

Give me a break. Those poor silver spoon kids. :sob:

Race is not considered.

Strange idea, but I suppose it has its merits. I got my AA from Columbia College, where getting in is as easy as enrolling (like every community college in the country), then completed my Bachelor’s of Mathematics from Missouri S&T.

I never took some silly aptitude test, I simply enrolled and maintained honors.

You may think the tests are silly, but your school requires them today.

I graduated 18 months ago, genius. lol

So? The admissions requirements say they are required. They must be lying.

Imagine that, you have no idea what you’re talking about. :roll_eyes: :rofl:

2 Likes

lol. Knowing two languages is cheating!