NFIB v Sebelius - one of the best of all times.
1 Like
No, it is not. But you know this.
The pendulum has been swinging back from Wickard, and has been since the 90s.
Well, that’s the thing.
Roberts’ opinion in NFIB v. Sebelius was in effect, a rebuke of Wickard.
Since you have this visceral hatred for the SC, how would determine constitutionality of laws.
His visceral hatred of all judges leads to his motivated reasoning in threads like this.
It would be hard to find a person more untrustworthy on the topic.
Ephors.
1 Like
Have you read Robert’s opinion?
Was it? On the surface it appears so.
Consistently?
Is the basis for it not common law?
The Constitution mentions common law in the 7th Amendment.
Generally, right thinks you interpret the constitution, the left thinks you can just make up what ever and pretend it’s in the constitution…
Yes, only in the courts do two wrong decisions make a right …
I was listening to Chuck Schumer talking about settle law being Constitutional…I’m going what does that mean?
Using precedent allows us to moves us to away from original intent into “Living Document” theory, or evolving Constitution 1 incremental steps at a time.
Now I understand why for consistency but you need to have correction in the system itself, without this corrections the Constitution would not be recognizable from original intent…in which we are witnessing today.
I also understand why democrats are advocating this in their attempt to remake society under their image…not our founders.
Yes. Goverment overreach had accelerated ever since.
You must be little boy. In time when you gain some wisdom under your belt you will realize respect should be given until you proven otherwise…in which you just clearly did.
I agree, it has to some extent…until 9/11.
You’ve also never said how you want laws determined for constitutionality since it appears you don’t like how the SC does it.
Are you ever going to grace us with an answer?
Indeed. Ruling according to the text and intent of the constitution gave us such rulings as Dred Scot.
Plessy vs Ferguson predated Brown vs Board of Education. Brown overturned Plessy.
By your reasoning we need to return the Plessy, since it interpreted the Constitution.
