Pregnant Woman Saves Family with AR-15

[WuWei]

@Blackwolf

@WuWei

How do you clear hallways?

Tactical nuke.

No such thing.

[AZslim]

@WuWei

@AZslim

@thinkingman

@thinkingman

@AZslim

She didn’t need a weapon of war. A handgun would have been able to fire one round.

was the ar-15 too effective?

or… wheres the line between just effective enough, and excessive when it comes to saving your family’s/loved one’s life?

A couple pounds of C4 would be excessive.

METT-TC dependent.

That’s why in this case it is excessive.

[WuWei]

@AZslim

@WuWei

@AZslim

@thinkingman

@thinkingman

@AZslim

She didn’t need a weapon of war. A handgun would have been able to fire one round.

was the ar-15 too effective?

or… wheres the line between just effective enough, and excessive when it comes to saving your family’s/loved one’s life?

A couple pounds of C4 would be excessive.

METT-TC dependent.

That’s why in this case it is excessive.

Not at all. In this case it is not discretionary enough.

[WildRose]

Nothing excessive about it. Why do you think cop’s grab AR’s when they know they are facing even a single shooter armed with a hand gun if one is available?

You always seek an advantage of the opponent if you can get one and again you don’t even know if she was minimally competent with a handgun.

The first thing you loose in a high stress situation is accuracy to grabbing the most accurate weapon you have access to is always the smart move.

[AZslim]

@WuWei

@AZslim

@WuWei

@AZslim

@thinkingman

@thinkingman

@AZslim

She didn’t need a weapon of war. A handgun would have been able to fire one round.

was the ar-15 too effective?

or… wheres the line between just effective enough, and excessive when it comes to saving your family’s/loved one’s life?

A couple pounds of C4 would be excessive.

METT-TC dependent.

That’s why in this case it is excessive.

Not at all. In this case it is not discretionary enough.

Too many civilian casualties.

[WildRose]

How many collateral casualties were there in this event?

[thinkingman]

@AZslim

@thinkingman

@thinkingman

@AZslim

She didn’t need a weapon of war. A handgun would have been able to fire one round.

was the ar-15 too effective?

or… wheres the line between just effective enough, and excessive when it comes to saving your family’s/loved one’s life?

A couple pounds of C4 would be excessive.

you could also pack the walls with dynamite.

indiscriminate explosives is not safe for those who are defending themselves

you dont have an argument

[thinkingman]

@AZslim

@markdido

It’s fun to watch the libs here soil themselves because a pregnant woman had the audacity to protect her family with a firearm instead of falling to her knees and being a victim.

Who in this thread was against the use of a firearm?

thats not the question.

the question is “who in the thread is against the freedom to choose a firearm?”

[PurpnGold]

@thinkingman

thats not the question.

the question is “who in the thread is against the freedom to choose a firearm?”

I am! Rights aren’t unlimited, sorry.

[AZslim]

@thinkingman

@AZslim

@markdido

It’s fun to watch the libs here soil themselves because a pregnant woman had the audacity to protect her family with a firearm instead of falling to her knees and being a victim.

Who in this thread was against the use of a firearm?

thats not the question.

the question is “who in the thread is against the freedom to choose a firearm?”

You are incorrect.

The statement to which I was replying to:

@markdido

It’s fun to watch the libs here soil themselves because a pregnant woman had the audacity to protect her family with a firearm instead of falling to her knees and being a victim.

To which I replied:

“Who in this thread was against the use of a firearm?”

[ImRightYoureWrong]

I only eat twigs and bamboo

[WildRose]

What firearms are not protected by the 2nd Amendment?

[Blackwolf]

@markdido

It’s fun to watch the libs here soil themselves because a pregnant woman had the audacity to protect her family with a firearm instead of falling to her knees and being a victim.

Which libs in particular are doing that?

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@WildRose

Nothing excessive about it. Why do you think cop’s grab AR’s when they know they are facing even a single shooter armed with a hand gun if one is available?

You always seek an advantage of the opponent if you can get one and again you don’t even know if she was minimally competent with a handgun.

The first thing you loose in a high stress situation is accuracy to grabbing the most accurate weapon you have access to is always the smart move.

Hmm. It’s almost like you are saying ARs are better for killing people.

[RTchoke]

Some people need a refresher course.

[mobulis]

@RTchoke

Some people need a refresher course.

Rights aren’t unlimited, sorry.

[markdido]

@mobulis

@RTchoke

Some people need a refresher course.

Rights aren’t unlimited, sorry.

Who said they are?

[RTchoke]

Only when libs agree with the limitations placed on them.

Otherwise they find all kinds of things to be encompassed as a “right”.

[AZslim]

@RTchoke

Only when libs agree with the limitations placed on them.

Otherwise they find all kinds of things to be encompassed as a “right”.

The same goes for cons.

[PurpnGold]

@RTchoke

Only when libs agree with the limitations placed on them.

Otherwise they find all kinds of things to be encompassed as a “right”.

Cons put limitations on firearms also. Sorry they aren’t unlimited