ITT people believing things are facts despite the author of these claims telling a court no reasonable person would believe they are facts.
1 Like
Really? How are you getting that? Nothing in there shows anything close to fraud, unless one engages in “specious reasoning”.
Well, there was fraud somewhere - and Sydney Powell has been gracious enough to let us know precisely where it was.
But by all means - go ahead and believe those who are now telling everyone they were full of ■■■■ in court documents.
1 Like
The numbers are facts.
Ok. Just like the 2020 numbers are facts.
The highest percentage of eligible voters voting was in 2008 and this election not only beat that…but crushed it being double digits higher. That indicates fraud.
So a guy with <40% approval lost an election? Been known to happen, I guess.
1 Like
Remember when many posters here were saying Dominion would never sue because they were afraid of what would be unearthed in discovery?
My how the times have changed…
5 Likes
I certainly don’t consider a voter turnout of under 70% as indicative of fraud.
It’s only “indicative of fraud” to those who can’t accept that people were ticked off enough at Trump’s ■■■■■■■■ that they came out in droves to ensure that he was evicted from the White House.
4 Likes
No, it doesn’t. Unless you employ Specious reasoning and faulty logic to arrive at a pre determined conclusion.
That’s how you get people to believe “widespread voter fraud”, by taking advantage of their ignorance on how voting works and not understanding a lot of things. All they know is their team lost and they can’t accept it, so they turn to increasingly wack a doodle conspiracy takes to try and make sense out of it, or at least “sense” that they can process.
You said you wanted this to go to court. Well, it’s IN court. Sidney Powell is desperately trying to get it out of court. She doesn’t seem very cocky about the whole “discovery” process like some of the dead enders out there.
4 Likes
None of the Normies do.
Personally, I am more used to an 80-90+% turnout.
Ahhhh…a nice speech of feelings because you can not logically refute the numbers I’ve shown.
Republicans across the country are busily addressing the problem of too many people exercising their right to vote.
2 Likes
Sidney Powel told a court that no reasonable person would believe her explanation of the numbers as a fact.
Why would it indicate fraud?
Seems to me that is indicates that Trump is a very polarizing figure that drives people to the polls.
1 Like
Did the fraud extend to trumps numbers, because unless I am mistaken, he got more votes than anyone else in history except biden.
3 Likes
If you can’t follow what’s been posted, I’m wasting my time. Bye Felicia. 
That’s funny. The contentions of “voter fraud” are based solely on feelings.
There is literally nothing to refute. Hand waving numbers of past elections literally mean nothing.
That’s all “voter fraud” is ie feelings. Feelings of anger, fear, confusion, rage.
Lost an election, straight up, no voter fraud. It’s just that simple.
3 Likes