I can think of several reasons to shoot a guy in the back that’s headed for a car full of children.
I’ll also wait for a bit more information before judging whether any of those scenarios are accurate, or whether it really was unjustified. Recent history provides plenty of examples of both, and even in the cases that turned out justified the left always gets burned by jumping on the bandwagon early.
IF deadly force was authorized (hypothetical) why is 7 shots excessive? If you shoot, you don’t aim to wound, why is seven shots aimed to kill more excessive than one or two shots aimed to kill?
businesses, cities, communities descending into violent chaos, innocent people getting hurt, killed for weeks on end, all for political agenda means nothing?
At least a half dozen witnesses said that the man had tried to break up a fight between the two women outside a home at 2805 40th St. and that police had attempted to use a Taser on the man prior to the shooting. Then, they heard at least seven gunshots ring out.
If it isn’t a liberal enclave, violent protesters will be arrested instead of allowed to riot at will. If protesters started burning things down around here, they wouldn’t be doing it for long.
I am not jumping in until we get more information.
This is what I am advocating for…Cooperate with the cops and let the system work from there. It takes some time to get to the truth when emotions run at an elevated rate.
You the one said disrespect to cops can’t be tolerated. In a thread about dude getting shot in the back seven times for disrespecting a cop. You didn’t just dip your toe in, you jumped in.
Yeah cause you live in the magical world of Indiana where somehow you’re immune to all this. I mean I guess the lack of any real cities in your state with the doubtful exception of Indianapolis could help.