One and only Kavenaugh Hearings Thread (part 1)

[LucyLou]

How convenient Kavanaugh had his list of 65 women he didn’t rape all ready to go. He knew what he did.

[FreeAndClear]

Omg hahahaha. I don’t believe you for a second but hey conspiracy peeps are gonna conspiracy

[Jezcoe]

@FreeAndClear

Omg hahahaha. I don’t believe you for a second but hey conspiracy peeps are gonna conspiracy

It seems that Ralph Blasey worked for Baker Hostetler twelve years ago.

Baker Hostetler hired Fusion GPS a full ten years after he left the firm… so there is a connection if one ignores temporal realities.

[rp5x5]

@FreeAndClear

Omg hahahaha. I don’t believe you for a second but hey conspiracy peeps are gonna conspiracy

So…https://archive.fo/bGxQf

Yeah “conspiracy theory” morons …

[madasheck]

@WildRose

@madasheck

@WildRose

@madasheck

@WildRose

@madasheck

@WildRose

@madasheck

@RTchoke

Do you know that doesn’t change the fact poly’s are a useless and irrelevant tool?

Stop. If they were useless police wouldn’t use them. Why do you people keep saying ridiculous things like this? It doesn’t make your point.

There is not a court in the US that will accept a polygraph as evidence because they are so unreliable.

Police can use them as one tool to help eliminate suspects but they cannot be used to prove anyone guilty of anything.

Irrelevant. This is not a court trial.

It’s completely relevant. If they were reliable they could be admitted as evidence.

This is NOT a court trial.

You’re stuck in one groove. They aren’t reliable hence the reason they cannot be admitted as evidence.

I’ll just keep repeating. Yes they can. This is not a court trial.

That is factually false on it’s face. A poly may not be admitted into evidence period because they are unreliable.

Your comment is irrelevant. This isn’t a court trial.

[Jezcoe]

His employment at a large law firm a good ten years before Fusion GPS hires them means what now?

[rp5x5]

Plastic heads have BPA.

[madasheck]

@WildRose

@madasheck

@Joanne

@madasheck

Irrelevant. This is not a court trial.

@madasheck

Stop. If they were useless police wouldn’t use them. Why do you people keep saying ridiculous things like this? It doesn’t make your point.

Make up your mind. Roy Moore and this woman allegedly passed their polygraphs. Should they both be believed now, or only one of them?

Moore was proven wrong.

No, he certainly wasn’t. The best case made against him proved to be a fraud.

Good freaking grief. No it wasn’t.

[madasheck]

@Joanne

@madasheck

This is NOT a court trial.

And yet you gave it credibility because she allegedly passed it.

This is not a court trial. This is not a court trial. This is not a court trial. How many times do I have to say that?

[madasheck]

Whatever. It has no relevance here.

[madasheck]

@Joanne

Here is what her Senate opponent had to say. I really hope she’s defeated.

SAN FRANCISCO — California state Sen. Kevin de León, the Democratic progressive aggressively challenging Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) for reelection, accused her of “gross misconduct” in her handling of a letter by an unnamed woman alleging sexual misconduct by Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

De León, in an interview with POLITICO Friday, blasted Feinstein for not raising the issue as Kavanaugh sat before the Judiciary committee for his confirmation hearings last week — or even discussing the matter privately her fellow Democrats on the Judiciary committee until this week.

Feinstein foe blasts her handling of Kavanaugh harassment claim - POLITICO

Politics makes for strange bedfellows. You expected her opponent to support what she did?

[madasheck]

@Samm

@madasheck

@WildRose

@madasheck

@WildRose

@madasheck

@DougBH

If she mentions a polygraph test, she would have brought up any witnesses she had, such as the counselor she supposedly talked to or anyone else she told about it at the time. I would assume there is no evidence if she didn’t bring it up.

You sound like you don’t believe this even happened.

There’s zero evidence to suggest that it did.

If there was zero evidence you wouldn’t have 'Pubs calling for the vote to be delayed.

Why should anyone believe it happened with zero evidence to corroborate her claim when her own story doesn’t even add up?

She went to therapy over it.

Which would explain why she believes it to be true. Every time a memory is recalled it is subject to editing and then it is the edited version that gets stored until the next time it is recalled … and so on. There is nothing like repeatedly talking about a memory with a therapist to solidify something in your mind that did not happen. It’s no wonder that she passed the polygraph.

Are you a psychiatrist now?

[madasheck]

@DougBH

@madasheck

@DougBH

If she mentions a polygraph test, she would have brought up any witnesses she had, such as the counselor she supposedly talked to or anyone else she told about it at the time. I would assume there is no evidence if she didn’t bring it up.

You sound like you don’t believe this even happened.

That is very likely. She now says she never mentioned it to anyone until 2012. She had decades to change in her mind what happened or who was involved.
Remember the Duke case?

Her critics aren’t in her head and don’t know what she went through. This amateur armchair psychiatry is ■■■■■■■■■

[madasheck]

@Mountain_Soldier

@madasheck

@Joanne

@madasheck

Irrelevant. This is not a court trial.

@madasheck

Stop. If they were useless police wouldn’t use them. Why do you people keep saying ridiculous things like this? It doesn’t make your point.

Make up your mind. Roy Moore and this woman allegedly passed their polygraphs. Should they both be believed now, or only one of them?

Moore was proven wrong.

But this woman can’t be wrong because she’s on your side. Got it.

You’ve got people here either saying she’s faking it or it’s too late to hear her. Given what’s been revealed she deserves to be heard. I hope she is.

[madasheck]

@GWH

Or just don’t make up stories because you have a political agenda.

Tell that to your so-called president.

[madasheck]

@LucyLou

How convenient Kavanaugh had his list of 65 women he didn’t rape all ready to go. He knew what he did.

Funny how they’re ignoring that.

[FreeAndClear]

Got it. Indeed conspiracy theory morons. Baker & Hostetler is a whte shoe firm with hundreds of clients. But I did make fun of you so for that i apologize.

[rp5x5]

Let’s review what this is really all about

“Hillary proceeded to pick up a full glass of water and throw it at the face of the assistant, and the screaming started.
She was in a full meltdown and no one on her staff dared speak with her — she went kind of manic and did not have any control over herself at that point. How these people work with this woman is amazing to me. She really didn’t seem to care who heard any of it.
You really had to see this to believe it. She came apart — literally unglued. She is the most foul-mouthed woman I’ve ever heard. And that voice at screech level — awful!
She screamed she’d get that ■■■■■■■ Lauer fired for this. Referring to Donald Trump, Clinton said, ‘If that ■■■■■■■ bastard wins, we all hang from nooses! Lauer’s finished, and if I lose, it’s all on your heads for screwing this up.’
Her dozen or more aides were visibly disturbed and tried to calm her down when she started shaking uncontrollably as she screamed to get an executive at Comcast, the parent company of NBC Universal, on the phone. Then two rather large aides grabbed her and helped her walk to her car.”

[GWH]

Tell that to your so called journalists at The NY Times.

[adroit]

@Joanne

Isn’t the answer to that rather obvious?

Well, she wrote to her own senator on the committee…